Re: [whatwg] Semantics in HTML

2006-11-04 Thread Henri Sivonen
On Nov 2, 2006, at 00:17, Anne van Kesteren wrote: On Wed, 01 Nov 2006 20:55:58 +0100, James Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: To take a slight detour into the (hopefully not too) abstract, what do people think the fundamental point of semantics in HTML is? I think the fundamental point is

Re: [whatwg] Semantics in HTML (was: Re: Joe Clark's Criticisms of the WHATWG and HTML 5)

2006-11-02 Thread Leons Petrazickis
On 11/1/06, Anne van Kesteren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, 01 Nov 2006 20:55:58 +0100, James Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> And HTML5 isn't that semantically pure anyway. >> >> Where can it be improved? > > To take a slight detour into the (hopefully not too) abstract, what do > peo

Re: [whatwg] Semantics in HTML

2006-11-01 Thread James Graham
Anne van Kesteren wrote: [...] I also don't know which view best fits my position because I don't really understand what people are trying to achieve with (the markup in) HTML -- I think there are things I would change in the current draft, but there seems little point talking about which marku