On Mon, 12 Oct 2009, Yuvalik Webdesign wrote:
The spec is not very clear anywhere about styling practices (I know
this is CSS' job, but within HTML the mark-up should at least be
mentioned).
Could you elaborate on what you had in mind? Note that default styles
are listed in
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009, Yuvalik Webdesign wrote:
A) In the NAV element it says: In particular, it is common for footers
to have a list of links to various key parts of a site, but the footer
element is more appropriate in such cases, and no nav element is
necessary for those links.
But then
From: Ian Hickson
C) When talking about outline (in the context of sectioning) I gather
we
are NOT talking about the DOM-tree, but about (a Table Of) Contents
kind
of outline.
Right.
Does a generic page-header and footer (containing a site-wide logo,
style and navigation)
From: Ian Hickson [mailto:i...@hixie.ch]
Please file specific bugs or send specific e-mails for each example you
think should be reworked; there are over 300 examples in the spec and
without knowing what is wrong with each one, if I just go through them
all
and change them, they're just
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 11:18 AM, Yuvalik Webdesign
postmas...@yuvalik.org wrote:
From: Ian Hickson [mailto:i...@hixie.ch]
Please file specific bugs or send specific e-mails for each example you
think should be reworked; there are over 300 examples in the spec and
without knowing what is
From: Tab Atkins Jr.
Definitely not; it's part of the application. From your snippet, the
page seems to be built as a picture-app, which means both the image
and the thumbnails work together; neither is tangential to the purpose
of the page like a sidebar would be.
I think this is the
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Yuvalik Webdesign
postmas...@yuvalik.org wrote:
From: Tab Atkins Jr.
iframe src=example1_jpg.html name=detail
p
A long story regarding the companies' origins and goals...
/p
div id=advert.../div
ul
lia target=detail
Evert wrote:
I am still having problems accepting the differences between
section and article though. I understand when to use one over
the other, but what was the background for choosing two elements
instead of one? What is the drawback of defining just one in the
spec (either section or
From: Tab Atkins Jr.
I meant it when I said you were overthinking things. ^_^ Don't try
too hard; the categories are general and pretty simple.
Very well, perhaps I am overcomplicating things a bit. I'll try to be a bit
less stringent in my mark-up (I guess I am trying to be too much of
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Yuvalik Webdesign
postmas...@yuvalik.org wrote:
B)
It also says for ASIDE that:
The aside element represents a section of a page that consists of content
that is tangentially related to the content around the aside element, and
which could be considered
From: Tab Atkins Jr.
Also, a side-bar, what is that, since side-bars are usually
separately layed-out and not always directly around the content.
You're interpreting around too strictly here. It means just
nearby here. It means exactly what it says - aside can be used
for marking up
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 5:33 PM, Yuvalik Webdesign
postmas...@yuvalik.org wrote:
From: Tab Atkins Jr.
Also, a side-bar, what is that, since side-bars are usually
separately layed-out and not always directly around the content.
You're interpreting around too strictly here. It means just
12 matches
Mail list logo
