On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
> >> >> Not quite sure I follow your proposal. How would you for example
>> >> >> increase the value of a property by one without risking race
>> >> >> conditions? Or keep two values in different properties in sync?
>> I.e.
>>
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> >> >> > Moreover, there are other examples which have been discussed on
> the
> >> >> > list. There are some DOM operations that can result in a frame
> >> >> > receiving
> >> >> > a DOM event synchronously. That can resul
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
> >> It still seems to me that it's extremely unlikely that pages depend on
>> cross origin events to fire synchronously. I can't even think of a
way
>> to test if a browser dispatches these events synchronously or not.
Can
>
> >> >> > Moreover, there are other examples which have been discussed on
the
>> >> > list. There are some DOM operations that can result in a frame
>> >> > receiving
>> >> > a DOM event synchronously. That can result in a nesting of
storage
>> >> > locks,
>
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 8:08 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 10:11 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:48 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Darin Fisher
>>> wrote:
>>> > On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 11:57 PM, Jonas Sicking
>>> w
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Darin Fisher wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 11:57 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 9:04 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
>> > On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Darin Fisher
>> >>
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 11:57 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 9:04 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Darin Fisher
> wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Jonas Sicking
> >>
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 9:28 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 5:52 AM, Darin Fisher wrote:
>
>> No, no... my point is that to the application developer, those "explicit"
>> points will appear quite implicit and mysterious. This is why I called
>> out third-party JS librarie
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 5:52 AM, Darin Fisher wrote:
> No, no... my point is that to the application developer, those "explicit"
> points will appear quite implicit and mysterious. This is why I called
> out third-party JS libraries. One day, a function that you are using
> might transition to
On Sep 23, 2009, at 3:29 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
In addition, this argument assumes that Microsoft (and other UAs)
will implement the structured clone version of LocalStorage. Has
anyone (or can anyone) from Microsoft comment on this?
Microsoft doesn't always comment on such issues, but
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Darin Fisher wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 1:17 AM, Darin Fisher wrote:
>> > On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 12:20 AM, Jonas Sicking
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:19 PM, Darin Fisher
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 01:45, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
[SNIP]
> These are all good suggestions, but I'm not sure even that API would be
> powerful enough for developers.
>
> For example, how would you implement an offline webmail app? Well, my first
> thought is to make each email a key/value. But
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 1:17 AM, Darin Fisher wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 12:20 AM, Jonas Sicking
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:19 PM, Darin Fisher
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Jon
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 1:17 AM, Darin Fisher wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 12:20 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:19 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Jeremy Orlo
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 12:20 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:19 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Jeremy Orlow
> wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Jonas Sickin
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 1:17 AM, Darin Fisher wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 12:20 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:19 PM, Darin Fisher
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Jonas Sicking
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Jerem
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 12:20 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:19 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Jeremy Orlow
> wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Jonas Sickin
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:19 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
>> > On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Brett Cannon wrot
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 13:35, Jeremy Orlow
> wrote:
> >
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>> > On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 13:35, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
>> >> What are the use cases for wanting to store data beyond strings (
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 13:35, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
> >> What are the use cases for wanting to store data beyond strings (and
> what
> >> can be serialized into strings) in LocalStora
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 13:35, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
>> What are the use cases for wanting to store data beyond strings (and what
>> can be serialized into strings) in LocalStorage? I can't think of any that
>> outweigh the negatives:
>> 1) F
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
> What are the use cases for wanting to store data beyond strings (and what
> can be serialized into strings) in LocalStorage? I can't think of any that
> outweigh the negatives:
> 1) From previous threads, I think it's fair to say that we can
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 13:35, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
> What are the use cases for wanting to store data beyond strings (and what
> can be serialized into strings) in LocalStorage? I can't think of any that
> outweigh the negatives:
> 1) From previous threads, I think it's fair to say that we can a
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 1:46 PM, João Eiras wrote:
>
> and the more browser UI jank users will be sure to experience.
>>
>
> If I may, as a side note, locking the UI is a user agent specific issue. No
> specification requires user agents to lock their UIs while scripts execute.
> Opera has achie
and the more browser UI jank users will be sure to experience.
If I may, as a side note, locking the UI is a user agent specific issue.
No specification requires user agents to lock their UIs while scripts
execute.
Opera has achieved this long time ago, by properly dividing ecmascript
ex
26 matches
Mail list logo
