OK, I'll just keep adding feedback to this thread. This is feedback
from the Webkit team about implementing WebVTT support.
1. White space between cue settings
It seems that where we have specified how to parse the cue settings,
we only allow a single white space as separator between subsequent
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer
wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>> On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 09:32:04 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Note that where his implementation differs from the spec, he has made
>>> a note. There are only two such n
Hi Marc,
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Marc 'Tafouk' wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> I've been following the latest developments on the WebVTT specification and
> am making an attempt to write an out-of-browser parser, using Anna
> Cavender's proposed patches to WebKit.
Cool! Is this a new video
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 09:32:04 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer
> wrote:
>>
>> Note that where his implementation differs from the spec, he has made
>> a note. There are only two such notes. I'd like to see these
>> addressed, too.
>
> Could you ple
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 09:32:04 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer
wrote:
Note that where his implementation differs from the spec, he has made
a note. There are only two such notes. I'd like to see these
addressed, too.
Could you please post these to the list so that we not all have to read
those documen
I wanted to mention that Ronny's page at
http://leanbackplayer.com/other/webvtt.html has had some updates
recently and has now settled, with demos at
http://leanbackplayer.com/test/webvtt.html .
Note that where his implementation differs from the spec, he has made
a note. There are only two such n
Hi all,
While we're on the topic of providing feedback on WebVTT, I want to
add some things that have crept up while trying to implement the spec
line by line.
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/webvtt.html
1. Text Track cue size
In the parsing section for cues, step 27, the defa
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 6:39 PM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 02:54:45 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Philip, all,
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 8:12 PM, Philip Jägenstedt
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, 04 Jun 2011 17:05:55 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer
>>> wrote:
>>>
> On Mon,
On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 02:54:45 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer
wrote:
Hi Philip, all,
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 8:12 PM, Philip Jägenstedt
wrote:
On Sat, 04 Jun 2011 17:05:55 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer
wrote:
On Mon, 3 Jan 2011, Philip J盲genstedt wrote:
Silvia, is your mail client a bit funny with ch
Hi Philip, all,
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 8:12 PM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
> On Sat, 04 Jun 2011 17:05:55 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer
> wrote:
>
>>> On Mon, 3 Jan 2011, Philip J盲genstedt wrote:
>
> Silvia, is your mail client a bit funny with character encodings? (The UTF-8
> representation of U+00E4 i
On Sat, 04 Jun 2011 17:05:55 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer
wrote:
On Mon, 3 Jan 2011, Philip J盲genstedt wrote:
Silvia, is your mail client a bit funny with character encodings? (The
UTF-8 representation of U+00E4 is the same as the GBK representation of
U+76F2.)
> > * The "bad cue" handling
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 3:41 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer
> wrote:
>>
>> I don't think your example is a typical one. In my (unmeasured)
>> experience, the scrolling behaviour is much more typical.
>
> It's definitely an uncommonly complex scene to cap
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 3:41 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer
wrote:
> I don't think your example is a typical one. In my (unmeasured)
> experience, the scrolling behaviour is much more typical.
>
It's definitely an uncommonly complex scene to caption. I raised it
wondering about the quality level the format
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer
> wrote:
>>
>> If we introduced the scrolling behaviour that I described above where
>> cues that are rendered into the same location as a previous still
>> active cue push that previous cue up
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer
wrote:
> If we introduced the scrolling behaviour that I described above where
> cues that are rendered into the same location as a previous still
> active cue push that previous cue up, we get this behaviour covered
> too.
>
I don't think so. Thi
15 matches
Mail list logo
