Re: [whatwg] getElementsBySelector etc

2005-09-22 Thread Sjoerd Visscher
be nice for all methods that return NodeLists. As NodeLists are live, adding a contains method, and a modification event to the NodeList interface should cover all you need and much more. -- Sjoerd Visscher http://w3future.com/weblog/

Re: [whatwg] [wf2] seeding SELECT with ambiguous XML

2005-07-20 Thread Sjoerd Visscher
should say PASS. (Note that I'm ignoring that you say that you load this file though a DATA attribute. I don't think it should matter how the markup has come into existence.) -- Sjoerd Visscher http://w3future.com/weblog/

Re: [whatwg] [html5] contenteditable specification

2005-07-19 Thread Sjoerd Visscher
t's fine if this is supported, as long as it can be turned off. -- Sjoerd Visscher http://w3future.com/weblog/

Re: [whatwg] [html5] window.print() undefined

2005-07-19 Thread Sjoerd Visscher
the user, but please let is be up to de web developer to act responsible with the features he has available. Who wants to annoy the customer anyway? -- Sjoerd Visscher http://w3future.com/weblog/

Re: [whatwg] WA1: attribute requirements

2005-07-18 Thread Sjoerd Visscher
have different types in different locations in the document. -- Sjoerd Visscher http://w3future.com/weblog/

Re: [whatwg] Some likeness of DOM Session scope

2005-07-18 Thread Sjoerd Visscher
t the basic site framework, and the client will read the query string and go to the sales department part. -- Sjoerd Visscher http://w3future.com/weblog/

Re: [whatwg] "canvas" tag and animations ?

2005-06-16 Thread Sjoerd Visscher
Dean Edwards wrote: Sjoerd Visscher wrote: Sjoerd Visscher wrote: Dean Edwards wrote: Charles Iliya Krempeaux wrote: To be honest, the think the idea of "drawing transactions" is better. Here are the reasons: #1: It makes it so, if the develop wants it, that they can have t

Re: [whatwg] "canvas" tag and animations ?

2005-06-16 Thread Sjoerd Visscher
Sjoerd Visscher wrote: Dean Edwards wrote: Charles Iliya Krempeaux wrote: To be honest, the think the idea of "drawing transactions" is better. Here are the reasons: #1: It makes it so, if the develop wants it, that they can have things that are "drawn" show up immed

Re: [whatwg] "canvas" tag and animations ?

2005-06-16 Thread Sjoerd Visscher
OK, I'll shut up about non scripting languages, I don't know anything about them. Charles Iliya Krempeaux wrote: Hello, On 6/15/05, Sjoerd Visscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Christian Biesinger wrote: Sjoerd Visscher wrote: Christian Biesinger wrote: Sjoerd Vissche

Re: [whatwg] "canvas" tag and animations ?

2005-06-15 Thread Sjoerd Visscher
Christian Biesinger wrote: Sjoerd Visscher wrote: Christian Biesinger wrote: Sjoerd Visscher wrote: This isn't needed. Just like in normal HTML a drawing transaction is automatically started when the javascript code starts Are the functions JavaScript-specific? Ehm, no. Actuall

Re: [whatwg] "canvas" tag and animations ?

2005-06-15 Thread Sjoerd Visscher
endering has been implemented for years. I don't think that will change, and so canvas has to play with the same rules. -- Sjoerd Visscher http://w3future.com/weblog/

Re: [whatwg] "canvas" tag and animations ?

2005-06-14 Thread Sjoerd Visscher
Christian Biesinger wrote: Sjoerd Visscher wrote: This isn't needed. Just like in normal HTML a drawing transaction is automatically started when the javascript code starts Are the functions JavaScript-specific? Ehm, no. Actually the automatic drawing transactions story applies to

Re: [whatwg] "canvas" tag and animations ?

2005-06-14 Thread Sjoerd Visscher
Dean Edwards wrote: Charles Iliya Krempeaux wrote: From what I undestood (from what Sjoerd Visscher was saying), is that there is no need for "drawing transactions" because of the way things are done with JavaScript and the DOM. Thanks for the very good explanation o

Re: [whatwg] "canvas" tag and animations ?

2005-06-13 Thread Sjoerd Visscher
is done. And this is how it is implemented in Firefox (don't know about Safari). Maybe the spec should describe this somewhere? Not specifically for canvas, but for script in general: Changes on the DOM must be performed instantly, and values like offsetWidth etc. must be recalculated, but

Re: [whatwg] A thought:

2005-05-12 Thread Sjoerd Visscher
e something that requires authors to use it properly... Why? People write browser/standard specific things all the time. If it works for them, who cares? I like this proposal because it actually solves the original problem, without a need for Google to change their accelerator code. -- Sjoe

Re: [whatwg] A thought:

2005-05-09 Thread Sjoerd Visscher
hat it can be cached. Setting the read state should be done seperately with POST. Most e-mail clients only mark an item read when it's open for a few seconds, it's a bonus that you can do that too. -- Sjoerd Visscher http://w3future.com/weblog/

Re: [whatwg] Canvas element

2005-04-20 Thread Sjoerd Visscher
. Does this make any sense? I think it does, I really like it. It is comparable with allowing the src attribute on any element, as XHTML2 is doing. -- Sjoerd Visscher http://w3future.com/weblog/