Re: Wiki-Stuff new website memory problem

http://81.17.46.170/bamboo -igor On 1/15/07, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 1/16/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > now all the builds should go perfect :) Talking about continuum? Where is it then? Frank

Re: Wiki-Stuff new website memory problem

On 1/16/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: now all the builds should go perfect :) Talking about continuum? Where is it then? Frank

Re: Fixing ComponentTest in Wicket 1.x

gah!!! 0 failures in eclipse windows 0 failures in cli windows 5 failures in unix wtf -igor On 1/15/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: seems like we really cant fix this. what is happening is this: the behavior url is rqeuested behaviortarget is resolved and pushed onto the requ

Re: Fixing ComponentTest in Wicket 1.x

seems like we really cant fix this. what is happening is this: the behavior url is rqeuested behaviortarget is resolved and pushed onto the request cycle behaviortarget pushes ajaxrequesttarget onto the request cycle request is processed request cycle cleans up by calling deatch() on all pushe

Re: Fixing ComponentTest in Wicket 1.x

wonder if this is a sideffect of wicket-tester? -igor On 1/14/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: But that can then only be happening if the detach is called between rendering calls of specific components (so in one request) Then page get's detached (makes the version final) and t

Re: Wiki-Stuff new website memory problem

now all the builds should go perfect :) On 1/16/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: confluence should be back up http://81.17.46.170/confluence/ notice we lost the port -igor On 1/15/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > sounds good > > -igor > > > On 1/15/07, Johan Co

Re: Wiki-Stuff new website memory problem

confluence should be back up http://81.17.46.170/confluence/ notice we lost the port -igor On 1/15/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: sounds good -igor On 1/15/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > i had some visitors this weekend :( Haven't touched my laptop to mu

Re: Wiki-Stuff new website memory problem

sounds good -igor On 1/15/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: i had some visitors this weekend :( Haven't touched my laptop to much.. Lets do it together tonight (around 21:00-22:00 my time) Then we can make all the things we need. johan On 1/14/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: matadatakeychange

On 1/15/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: That param is just so that we can really check it at runtime time. But if we think we really don't need it. Jonathan and I were in the same room when he coded this up, and we talked about how we needed such a construct because we couldn

Re: matadatakeychange

That param is just so that we can really check it at runtime time. But if we think we really don't need it. Generics is just perfect for MetaData because you exactly what you get back.. What that metadata represents.. (not just about the cast itself) Type erasure thats the big problem here :

Render a javascript in header via ajaxTarget

Hi all, I add a new script (a new function that never been render before) in headerContributor tag of an ajaxTarget. After ajaxResponse, I tried to call this function but it seems it has not been defined (function x not defined) I took a look at wicket-ajax.js and processScript method. I

Re: matadatakeychange

MetaDataKey was setup with the parameter because we couldn't use generics for Wicket 1.x. But well... So, you and Igor want to keep the generics on top of the parameter, just so that you don't have to cast when you get a value? It's not even more efficient code-wise, and you won't gain any extra

Re: Render a javascript in header via ajaxTarget

Matej Knopp wrote: That should work. I see no reason why ajax header contribution should fail adding function. Do you use lastest wicket (any branch). If so, can you please provide a quickstart app, so that I can look at it? Just try to put an alert('foo'); in a header contributor re-rendere

Re: Render a javascript in header via ajaxTarget

That should work. I see no reason why ajax header contribution should fail adding function. Do you use lastest wicket (any branch). If so, can you please provide a quickstart app, so that I can look at it? -Matej Vincent Demay wrote: Hi all, I add a new script (a new function that never been

Render a javascript in header via ajaxTarget

Hi all, I add a new script (a new function that never been render before) in headerContributor tag of an ajaxTarget. After ajaxResponse, I tried to call this function but it seems it has not been defined (function x not defined) I took a look at wicket-ajax.js and processScript method. I

Re: Wiki-Stuff new website memory problem

i had some visitors this weekend :( Haven't touched my laptop to much.. Lets do it together tonight (around 21:00-22:00 my time) Then we can make all the things we need. johan On 1/14/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: johan said he will be working on the server over the weekend, a

Re: matadatakeychange

We don't now have any runtime checks. So with a bit of casting and "forgetting" generics you can now store in a metadata key something that isn't meant for this key.. So keeping both is my preference if we keep one then the parameterization because that is a bit cleaner when using the metadata's

Re: VOTE: keep order sequence of ajaxtarget.add(Component) calls for rendering WAS [Wicket-user] add order in AjaxRequestTarget

+1 doesn't seem to difficult to me to implement and wouldn't break anything So having something in a predefined order looks fine to me. johan On 1/13/07, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +1 On 1/12/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > we need an official vote on this, the s