On 1/24/07, Vincent Demay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if you _do_ need it to be called _during_ the rendering then we will
have to
extract an interface from the target that only has prependjavascript()
and
you will only get that in the listener instead of the target itself.
you means
Igor Vaynberg a écrit :
On 1/24/07, Vincent Demay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if you _do_ need it to be called _during_ the rendering then we will
have to
extract an interface from the target that only has prependjavascript()
and
you will only get that in the listener instead of the target
wonderful :)
-igor
On 1/24/07, Vincent Demay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Igor Vaynberg a écrit :
On 1/24/07, Vincent Demay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if you _do_ need it to be called _during_ the rendering then we will
have to
extract an interface from the target that only has
Ok it is done you could find a patch on jira :
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-234
Thanks for your help Igor
Igor Vaynberg a écrit :
wonderful :)
-igor
On 1/24/07, Vincent Demay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Igor Vaynberg a écrit :
On 1/24/07, Vincent Demay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-100
We already have the site up on apache: http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKETxSITE
Martijn
On 1/24/07, Eelco Hillenius (JIRA) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12467112
]
You might want to subtract 2 more if you want to win this :)
Eelco
On 1/24/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-100
We already have the site up on apache: http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKETxSITE
Martijn
On 1/24/07, Eelco Hillenius (JIRA) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[
if we already have the site there, then why are we still hosting it on
sf.net?
-igor
On 1/24/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-100
We already have the site up on apache: http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKETxSITE
Martijn
On 1/24/07, Eelco Hillenius (JIRA) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because we are still not officially landed on apache. Same argument
for the user list.
Martijn
On 1/24/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if we already have the site there, then why are we still hosting it on
sf.net?
-igor
On 1/24/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-100
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
umm, but we have a wiki, we dont need to redirect to wicket.apache.org but
to apache.org/confluence/whateverstaticexportwhatchamaggicit
During incubation, our Apache site is incubator.apache.org/wicket. We
can sync Confluence into that.
Regards, Upayavira
On 1/24/07,
so lets, who do we bug to do that?
-igor
On 1/24/07, Upayavira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
umm, but we have a wiki, we dont need to redirect to wicket.apache.orgbut
to apache.org/confluence/whateverstaticexportwhatchamaggicit
During incubation, our Apache site is
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
so lets, who do we bug to do that?
I don't really know how to do it at this point, but I guess you could
bug me.
Upayavira
* Ingo Adler:
I'm not using Maven. I use Ant and Ivy.
Me too. And I'd love to see Wicket using the successful combo,
but this is not (yet) the case of others[1].
I like the wicket-all idea. One version - one distribution - one
download.
First step: I create (or copy) an IntelliJ
12 matches
Mail list logo
