Re: VOTE: remove Page.before/afterCallComponent()

2007-01-25 Thread Al Maw
Frank Bille wrote: On 1/22/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: this api is simply too fragile. any custom requesttarget impl has to call this in order for it to be consistent, and if its not consistent its useless. +1 because of fragile api. +1 This is currently biting me for AJAX

Re: Packaging our releases

2007-01-25 Thread Al Maw
Martijn Dashorst wrote: Our current Wicket release distribution consists of several zip files, [...] Wheee, this is almost getting religious. :) Maven 2 users just, errr, use Maven 2. :) So for the others, I'd have thought it simplest to have a single zip/tgz download containing the wicket

Wicket and OSGi

2007-01-25 Thread Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
Hi, I have been looking for references on Wicket and OSGi and all solutions I have seen make use of the WicketServlet (since OSGi HTTP Service only allows to register servlets) . But now the preferred way to use Wicket is via a WicketFilter instead of WicketServlet (which his now deprecated,

Re: Wicket and OSGi

2007-01-25 Thread Igor Vaynberg
yes we are aware of this, and yes we plan on supporting the servlet for osgi. that message is there to let our web users know to use the filter instead, feel free to ignore it. if you look closer, even though the message says its deprecated, the class carries no @deprecated annotation. as