Re: Bug in new serialization?

2007-03-04 Thread Johan Compagner
thats fine by me that we don't have it in a release But i will try to look at it ASAP. johan On 3/4/07, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If this is not fixed before we release 1.3 alphabeta, I think we have to turn it of per default. Frank On 3/3/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [VOTE] Approve the Release of Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating

2007-03-04 Thread Frank Bille
Yeah sorry. Perhaps I should have explained my thoughts. But yes, will we put license headers in generated files such as javadoc and maven site? IMO if there is some easy plugin for maven or assembly that can do it, then perhaps we should. But I don't want to spend a lot of time on it. Let me see

Re: releasing 1.3

2007-03-04 Thread Eelco Hillenius
Perhaps we should create a "Release Wicket 1.3 alpha proposal" wiki page where we write about the release and the legals. Sure. As long as we call it beta rather than alpha :) Eelco

Re: [VOTE] Approve the Release of Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating

2007-03-04 Thread Martijn Dashorst
You mean that we should include the ASL in generated stuff, such as our JavaDoc? Do you have other parts in mind? Martijn On 3/4/07, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 3/4/07, Jean T. Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Regarding not including the ASF header in generated output, altho

Re: Bug in new serialization?

2007-03-04 Thread Frank Bille
If this is not fixed before we release 1.3 alphabeta, I think we have to turn it of per default. Frank On 3/3/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The serialization is not enabled by default. So maybe it is the filepagestore that is causing this problem Will look into this. johan

Re: releasing 1.3

2007-03-04 Thread Frank Bille
On 3/2/07, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 3/1/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Someone needs to try running RAT on our codebase. > > Hey Frank, could you give that a go? Yes, finally (Thx Igor). I'll look at it this weekend. I have run rat on most of the proje

Re: svn commit: r514405 [1/8] - in /incubator/wicket/branches/wicket-1.x/wicket-examples: ./ src/assembly/ src/main/java/wicket/examples/ src/main/java/wicket/examples/ajax/builtin/ src/main/java/wick

2007-03-04 Thread Frank Bille
Ok it seems that they use a staight BSD license[1] as one of there dual license licenses. So we should be ok, if we state in our NOTICE that we use it under the BSD license. Frank [1]: http://manual.dojotoolkit.org/WikiHome/DojoDotBook/Book15 On 3/4/07, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Approve the Release of Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating

2007-03-04 Thread Frank Bille
On 3/4/07, Jean T. Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Regarding not including the ASF header in generated output, although it isn't required it's still a good idea to include it where feasible so end users aren't confused about usage [1]. In my opinion it isn't a show stopper for this release,

Re: svn commit: r514405 [1/8] - in /incubator/wicket/branches/wicket-1.x/wicket-examples: ./ src/assembly/ src/main/java/wicket/examples/ src/main/java/wicket/examples/ajax/builtin/ src/main/java/wick

2007-03-04 Thread Frank Bille
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/wicket/branches/wicket-1.x/wicket-examples/src/main/java/wicket/examples/preview/dojo.js?view=log On 3/4/07, Jean-Baptiste Quenot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: * [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Author: frankbille > Date: Sun Mar 4 07:27:59 2007 > New Revision: 514405 >

Re: svn commit: r514405 [1/8] - in /incubator/wicket/branches/wicket-1.x/wicket-examples: ./ src/assembly/ src/main/java/wicket/examples/ src/main/java/wicket/examples/ajax/builtin/ src/main/java/wick

2007-03-04 Thread Jean-Baptiste Quenot
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Author: frankbille > Date: Sun Mar 4 07:27:59 2007 > New Revision: 514405 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=514405 > Log: > Added missing license headers. > Added attributions to the NOTICE. > I'm not sure about DOJO and JettyHelper classes. Are they under