Re: VOTE: New roadmap and desicion on the future of Wicket 2.0 branch

2007-03-15 Thread Frank Bille
I totally agree. I have also started a release wiki page where I try to collect the information about the legals we have been going through and solved. http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Wicket+1.3.0+incubating+checkpoint+1 Frank On 3/15/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: svn commit: r518211 - /incubator/wicket/branches/wicket-1.x/jdk-1.4/wicket/src/main/java/wicket/ajax/wicket-ajax.js

2007-03-15 Thread Matej Knopp
sure, i'll resolve it just after anyone confirm that the thing finally works :) -Matej On 3/14/07, Jean-Baptiste Quenot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Author: knopp Date: Wed Mar 14 09:45:14 2007 New Revision: 518211 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=518211

Possible collisions between Channels in wicket-ajax.js

2007-03-15 Thread Martin Funk
Hi, as I see it Wicket.Ajax.getTransport sometimes returns XMLHttpRequest objects that are in readyState == 4 so they still might be processed by the stateChangeCallback. Once stateChangeCallback reaches t.onreadystatechange = Wicket.emptyFunction; the freshly created XMLHttpRequest never

Re: Possible collisions between Channels in wicket-ajax.js

2007-03-15 Thread Matej Knopp
But the channel is only dead if the xmlhtprequest wasn't processed properly. And that should never happen. If the xmlhttprequest is in pol with readyState == 4, then new xmlhttprequest should be created. Can you demonstrate the behavior you're describing on a quick start project? -Matej On

Re: Release 1.3 - status

2007-03-15 Thread Gwyn Evans
Without being 100% sure about what you're aiming for, this is what I'm doing in one of my projects, which might help? pom.xml: plugin artifactIdmaven-assembly-plugin/artifactId configuration outputDirectorytarget/release/outputDirectory

Re: VOTE: New roadmap and desicion on the future of Wicket 2.0 branch

2007-03-15 Thread Gwyn Evans
+1 /Gwyn On 14/03/07, Al Maw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There's been a lot of comment and discussion lately about the future direction of Wicket, and the trunk/2.0 branch in particular. We've done some hard thinking and we now have a roadmap for the future. When What

Re: Possible collisions between Channels in wicket-ajax.js

2007-03-15 Thread Matej Knopp
Okay, i've fixed it. Thanks for pointing out the problem. Can you please confirm that the fix solves it for you? On 3/15/07, Martin Funk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here ist is: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-392 The chocking happens even on the same channel. Martin Matej

Re: Possible collisions between Channels in wicket-ajax.js

2007-03-15 Thread Martin Funk
it does, thnx, Martin Matej Knopp schrieb: Okay, i've fixed it. Thanks for pointing out the problem. Can you please confirm that the fix solves it for you? On 3/15/07, Martin Funk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here ist is: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-392 The chocking happens