I forgot +1 myself
On 3/28/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And you can find the stuff here:
http://people.apache.org/~dashorst/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-incubating-alpha
Martijn
On 3/28/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've tried to remove some issues from our
Comments are welcomed:
The Wicket community voted to release its first incubator release. [1]
Wicket is a component based Java web application framework, undergoing
incubation since october 2006. The Wicket community asks the Incubator
PMC to
On 3/29/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[1] http://tinyurl.com/yoxea
Is it just me or is this link resolving to something like
host.wallstreetcity.com?
Frank
P.s. I like the text.
On 3/29/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/28nkjs
should work better (and goes directly to the tally)
Muuuch better :)
Frank
[x] Yes release the damned thing already
[ ] Yes, this is the last time I vote on this... My + and 1 keys show
signs of wear
[ ] No, I found this issue and you'd better fix it, or ...
--
Jean-Baptiste Quenot
aka John Banana Qwerty
http://caraldi.com/jbq/
* Matej Knopp:
I don't really see that happen. It's definitely not going to be
applied. Modal window is lot of work to maintain right now. If
you need it, you can try to fork your own.
May the assignee resolve the issue as WONTFIX then?
--
Jean-Baptiste Quenot
aka John Banana
i guess so
On 3/29/07, Jean-Baptiste Quenot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Matej Knopp:
I don't really see that happen. It's definitely not going to be
applied. Modal window is lot of work to maintain right now. If
you need it, you can try to fork your own.
May the assignee resolve the
Likewise... :-)
[x] Yes release the damned thing already
/Gwyn
On 29/03/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I forgot +1 myself
On 3/28/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And you can find the stuff here:
looks good to me
-igor
On 3/29/07, Frank Bille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/29/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/28nkjs
should work better (and goes directly to the tally)
Muuuch better :)
Frank
Should we be pointing toward any explanation/summary of what's got
licence headers vs what's not?
Just wondering if we're going that have questions raised on that, that
we might be able to try satisfy, or at least respond to, as part of
the email.
/Gwyn
On 29/03/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL
Tried that but couldn't find the link. Thx... I'll update the link.
Martijn
On 3/29/07, Gwyn Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Strictly, it should link to
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/wicket-130-incubating-alpha-1.html
/Gwyn
On 29/03/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I added the
I really like the new models.
But IMHO there are some quirks in the new model hierarchy, probably due
to the latest model backports:
- PropertyModel#propertyType(Component)
Is never called, has a @see to non existent method
AbstractPropertyModel#propertyType(Component)
-
Hi,
I found that at the moment isBehaviorAccepted() method is not being called
from renderHead() method,
meaning that if behavior is rejected by component, it will contribute to the
header anyway. Is it expected?
Alex
Good point. I'll fix it right away.
Eelco
On 3/29/07, Alexei Sokolov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I found that at the moment isBehaviorAccepted() method is not being called
from renderHead() method,
meaning that if behavior is rejected by component, it will contribute to the
header anyway.
I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-435.
Thanks for mentioning we need to do some work on it. If you're able
to, a patch would be more than welcome, as a bit on how to migrate on
the WIKI: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-435
Eelco
On 3/29/07, Sven Meier [EMAIL
Thanks for mentioning we need to do some work on it. If you're able
to, a patch would be more than welcome, as a bit on how to migrate on
the WIKI: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-435
Sry, that's
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/migrate-13.html#Migrate-1.3-IModelchange
Eelco
i think you should leave the isenabled check. isbehavioraccepted does it,
sure. but as users override it, will they remember to call super? its not in
javadoc and is not enforced. and if they do not call super they can override
what is behavior's choice not the components.
-igor
On 3/29/07,
17 matches
Mail list logo