Re: [VOTE] release wicket-1.3.0-incubating-alpha (new version)

2007-03-29 Thread Martijn Dashorst
I forgot +1 myself On 3/28/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And you can find the stuff here: http://people.apache.org/~dashorst/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-incubating-alpha Martijn On 3/28/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've tried to remove some issues from our

[proposal] message to ipmc to ratify the release

2007-03-29 Thread Martijn Dashorst
Comments are welcomed: The Wicket community voted to release its first incubator release. [1] Wicket is a component based Java web application framework, undergoing incubation since october 2006. The Wicket community asks the Incubator PMC to

Re: [proposal] message to ipmc to ratify the release

2007-03-29 Thread Frank Bille
On 3/29/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [1] http://tinyurl.com/yoxea Is it just me or is this link resolving to something like host.wallstreetcity.com? Frank P.s. I like the text.

Re: [proposal] message to ipmc to ratify the release

2007-03-29 Thread Frank Bille
On 3/29/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://tinyurl.com/28nkjs should work better (and goes directly to the tally) Muuuch better :) Frank

Re: [VOTE] release wicket-1.3.0-incubating-alpha (new version)

2007-03-29 Thread Jean-Baptiste Quenot
[x] Yes release the damned thing already [ ] Yes, this is the last time I vote on this... My + and 1 keys show signs of wear [ ] No, I found this issue and you'd better fix it, or ... -- Jean-Baptiste Quenot aka John Banana Qwerty http://caraldi.com/jbq/

Re: Non-Modal Window

2007-03-29 Thread Jean-Baptiste Quenot
* Matej Knopp: I don't really see that happen. It's definitely not going to be applied. Modal window is lot of work to maintain right now. If you need it, you can try to fork your own. May the assignee resolve the issue as WONTFIX then? -- Jean-Baptiste Quenot aka John Banana

Re: Non-Modal Window

2007-03-29 Thread Matej Knopp
i guess so On 3/29/07, Jean-Baptiste Quenot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Matej Knopp: I don't really see that happen. It's definitely not going to be applied. Modal window is lot of work to maintain right now. If you need it, you can try to fork your own. May the assignee resolve the

Re: [VOTE] release wicket-1.3.0-incubating-alpha (new version)

2007-03-29 Thread Gwyn Evans
Likewise... :-) [x] Yes release the damned thing already /Gwyn On 29/03/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I forgot +1 myself On 3/28/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And you can find the stuff here:

Re: [proposal] message to ipmc to ratify the release

2007-03-29 Thread Igor Vaynberg
looks good to me -igor On 3/29/07, Frank Bille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/29/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://tinyurl.com/28nkjs should work better (and goes directly to the tally) Muuuch better :) Frank

Re: [proposal] message to ipmc to ratify the release

2007-03-29 Thread Gwyn Evans
Should we be pointing toward any explanation/summary of what's got licence headers vs what's not? Just wondering if we're going that have questions raised on that, that we might be able to try satisfy, or at least respond to, as part of the email. /Gwyn On 29/03/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL

Re: [proposal] message to ipmc to ratify the release

2007-03-29 Thread Martijn Dashorst
Tried that but couldn't find the link. Thx... I'll update the link. Martijn On 3/29/07, Gwyn Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Strictly, it should link to http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/wicket-130-incubating-alpha-1.html /Gwyn On 29/03/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I added the

Model quirks

2007-03-29 Thread Sven Meier
I really like the new models. But IMHO there are some quirks in the new model hierarchy, probably due to the latest model backports: - PropertyModel#propertyType(Component) Is never called, has a @see to non existent method AbstractPropertyModel#propertyType(Component) -

Component.isBehaviorAccepted() is not being checked inside Component.renderHead()

2007-03-29 Thread Alexei Sokolov
Hi, I found that at the moment isBehaviorAccepted() method is not being called from renderHead() method, meaning that if behavior is rejected by component, it will contribute to the header anyway. Is it expected? Alex

Re: Component.isBehaviorAccepted() is not being checked inside Component.renderHead()

2007-03-29 Thread Eelco Hillenius
Good point. I'll fix it right away. Eelco On 3/29/07, Alexei Sokolov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I found that at the moment isBehaviorAccepted() method is not being called from renderHead() method, meaning that if behavior is rejected by component, it will contribute to the header anyway.

Re: Model quirks

2007-03-29 Thread Eelco Hillenius
I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-435. Thanks for mentioning we need to do some work on it. If you're able to, a patch would be more than welcome, as a bit on how to migrate on the WIKI: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-435 Eelco On 3/29/07, Sven Meier [EMAIL

Re: Model quirks

2007-03-29 Thread Eelco Hillenius
Thanks for mentioning we need to do some work on it. If you're able to, a patch would be more than welcome, as a bit on how to migrate on the WIKI: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-435 Sry, that's http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/migrate-13.html#Migrate-1.3-IModelchange Eelco

Re: svn commit: r523920 - /incubator/wicket/branches/wicket-1.x/jdk-1.4/wicket/src/main/java/wicket/Component.java

2007-03-29 Thread Igor Vaynberg
i think you should leave the isenabled check. isbehavioraccepted does it, sure. but as users override it, will they remember to call super? its not in javadoc and is not enforced. and if they do not call super they can override what is behavior's choice not the components. -igor On 3/29/07,