* Martijn Dashorst:
> We have some feedback on the release and should work on resolving
> that. There are several avenues we can walk to fix it.
>
> - fix the release branch and re-issue that (requires some backporting
> of threadtest iirc)
> - port the release stuff to the 1.x branch, and cut a n
On 4/2/07, Jean-Baptiste Quenot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I would have put the release stuff in the 1.x branch in the first
place. Now that it ended up there, the sooner it comes back to
1.x the better.
No, because you don't want to build a release against a moving target,
which the 1.x branc
Hi,
I'm a little bit confused about wicket-contrib-dojo and their minimum
JDK requirement (1.4 or 1.5). Currently, it seems that
wicket-contrib-dojo requires 1.5 and that wicket-contrib-dojo-examples
requires 1.4. This last one isn't building because it contains @Override
annotations in the sample
Hi Bart
Actually WCD was jdk1.4 compliant but a recent issue has been open
(http://81.17.46.170:8090/jira/browse/DOJO-27) to move to 1.4. But you
are right. We also need to move example from 1.4 to 1.5. I will update
pom.xml file.
Cheers
--
Vincent
Bart Molenkamp a écrit :
Hi,
I'm a litt
Dutch saying, "from uitstel komt afstel"
from? let me check the dutch dictionary..