Re: Incubator release and what now?

2007-04-02 Thread Jean-Baptiste Quenot
* Martijn Dashorst: > We have some feedback on the release and should work on resolving > that. There are several avenues we can walk to fix it. > > - fix the release branch and re-issue that (requires some backporting > of threadtest iirc) > - port the release stuff to the 1.x branch, and cut a n

Re: Incubator release and what now?

2007-04-02 Thread Martijn Dashorst
On 4/2/07, Jean-Baptiste Quenot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I would have put the release stuff in the 1.x branch in the first place. Now that it ended up there, the sooner it comes back to 1.x the better. No, because you don't want to build a release against a moving target, which the 1.x branc

[wicket-contrib-dojo] JDK 1.4 or JDK 1.5?

2007-04-02 Thread Bart Molenkamp
Hi, I'm a little bit confused about wicket-contrib-dojo and their minimum JDK requirement (1.4 or 1.5). Currently, it seems that wicket-contrib-dojo requires 1.5 and that wicket-contrib-dojo-examples requires 1.4. This last one isn't building because it contains @Override annotations in the sample

Re: [wicket-contrib-dojo] JDK 1.4 or JDK 1.5?

2007-04-02 Thread Vincent Demay
Hi Bart Actually WCD was jdk1.4 compliant but a recent issue has been open (http://81.17.46.170:8090/jira/browse/DOJO-27) to move to 1.4. But you are right. We also need to move example from 1.4 to 1.5. I will update pom.xml file. Cheers -- Vincent Bart Molenkamp a écrit : Hi, I'm a litt

Re: proposal for feedback messages refactor

2007-04-02 Thread Johan Compagner
Dutch saying, "from uitstel komt afstel" from? let me check the dutch dictionary..