well, from a user point of view, the fact that you can't make a
component visible using Ajax by simply doing:
component.setVisible(true)
target.addComponent(component)
is perceived as a bug. And I can't believe you guys won't find something
smarter for Wicket than using a surrounding container
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
So you mean:
Label l = Label("foo", "hello");
renders:
hello
... some ajax stuff, or a normal page render:
l.setVisible(false);
renders:
not @wicket:id, but just @id, because the Label should have
setOutputMarkupId(true) to be refreshed with ajax
Fred
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
Currently everybody assumes (correctly) that the element is completely
removed (Ajax and non-Ajax), i.e. not present in the final markup.
This means that scripts that iterate through the dom, or check for the
document.getElementById() == null will fail if we implement this
hat do you mean by security problem?
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > If the the component that is set to none visible is none
visible
>> > > > because of
>> > > > security
>> > > > So it has da
and @deprecation for that. This change doesn't have any of those
safeguards.
Martijn
On 3/19/07, Frédéric Bertin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> Currently everybody assumes (correctly) that the element is completely
> removed (Ajax and non-Ajax), i.e. not pres
r
> > something similiar, that takes more space then just one bit in
flags.
> >
> > I think we can just make a getter, that by default returns the value
> > from application settings. And you can override that for your
> > component, if you want something differen
require an enum, int, byte or
> > something similiar, that takes more space then just one bit in
flags.
> >
> > I think we can just make a getter, that by default returns the value
> > from application settings. And you can override that for your
> > component, if
nk deprecating set/isVisible is the
>> way to
>> > > go. Plus there are other reasons: As now we use one flag for
visible
>> > > status. With your approach you'd require an enum, int, byte or
>> > > something similiar, that takes more space the
