OK,
I've extracted a new wicket-portlets project and it is available here:
*
http://wicket-stuff.svn.sf.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/branches/wicket-1.3/wicket-portlets
*
http://wicket-stuff.svn.sf.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/branches/wicket-1.3/wicket-portlet-examples/
I also updated our migration
Yep, that should be all.
Janne
On 18.3.2007, at 15.08, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
I've moved the wicket-portlet-examples from Apache to wicket-stuff
svn.
Is the portlet support only contained in the following packages?
wicket.protocol.http.portlet
wicket.protocol.http.portlet.pages
?
Marti
I've moved the wicket-portlet-examples from Apache to wicket-stuff svn.
Is the portlet support only contained in the following packages?
wicket.protocol.http.portlet
wicket.protocol.http.portlet.pages
?
Martijn
On 3/18/07, Janne Hietamäki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
Yeah, let's move the p
+1
Yeah, let's move the portlet support to the wicket-stuff or some
subproject in apache. I could finally fix the two known bugs, but
since I'm not really using portlet stuff in any real-world
application, the portlet support would still be highly experimental/
incomplete.
Janne
On 18.
+1
Eelco
On 3/17/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
until we have a core committer who is actually using this stuff for real
projects its pointless to have it in core. it stagnates and breaks. i dont
think we should have something that is potentially broken/incomplete in our
relea
+1
until we have a core committer who is actually using this stuff for real
projects its pointless to have it in core. it stagnates and breaks. i dont
think we should have something that is potentially broken/incomplete in our
releases
-igor
On 3/17/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
The portlets integration is not something that is mainained very well,
at least I know nothing about it, and our ipmc members that do know
something about portlets are too busy with other things.
I tried to integrate the portlet examples into our main examples but
that didn't work. I know there a
