I think it is time to close the vote and count our blessings. As Al is
now under water, surfing or generally having a great time, I call the
vote.
7 +1 binding votes,
According to me we have 4 abstainees, and no non-binding votes.
This wraps it: we will drop the constructor change and migrate
I totally agree. I have also started a release wiki page where I try to
collect the information about the legals we have been going through and
solved.
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Wicket+1.3.0+incubating+checkpoint+1
Frank
On 3/15/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1
/Gwyn
On 14/03/07, Al Maw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's been a lot of comment and discussion lately about the future
direction of Wicket, and the trunk/2.0 branch in particular.
We've done some hard thinking and we now have a roadmap for the future.
When What
+1 (binding)
Martijn
--
Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com
Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket
Wicket 1.2.5 will keep your server alive. Download Wicket now!
http://wicketframework.org
+1 (binding)
-igor
On 3/14/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 (binding)
Eelco
On 3/14/07, Al Maw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's been a lot of comment and discussion lately about the future
direction of Wicket, and the trunk/2.0 branch in particular.
We've done some hard
+1 and I still think we should do a 1.3 release to IPMC now
Frank
On 3/15/07, Al Maw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's been a lot of comment and discussion lately about the future
direction of Wicket, and the trunk/2.0 branch in particular.
We've done some hard thinking and we now have a
we are doing that, but its not a public release
-igor
On 3/14/07, Frank Bille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 and I still think we should do a 1.3 release to IPMC now
Frank
On 3/15/07, Al Maw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's been a lot of comment and discussion lately about the future
