Re: any objections to upgrade to slf4j 1.4.0?

2007-06-29 Thread Frank Bille
On 6/29/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We are on 1.3.1 now but i see there is a 1.4.0 and i have to use it anyway in another project (thats also using wicket) so i could also upgrade wicket to 1.4.0 +0 Frank

Re: any objections to upgrade to slf4j 1.4.0?

2007-06-29 Thread Igor Vaynberg
+1 -igor On 6/29/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We are on 1.3.1 now but i see there is a 1.4.0 and i have to use it anyway in another project (thats also using wicket) so i could also upgrade wicket to 1.4.0 johan

Re: any objections to upgrade to slf4j 1.4.0?

2007-06-29 Thread Al Maw
Johan Compagner wrote: We are on 1.3.1 now but i see there is a 1.4.0 and i have to use it anyway in another project (thats also using wicket) so i could also upgrade wicket to 1.4.0 Fine, provided they're drop-in compatible, which I think they are. Al -- Alastair Maw Wicket-biased blog at ht

Re: any objections to upgrade to slf4j 1.4.0?

2007-06-29 Thread Sean Sullivan
+1 On 6/29/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We are on 1.3.1 now but i see there is a 1.4.0 and i have to use it anyway in another project (thats also using wicket) so i could also upgrade wicket to 1.4.0 johan

Re: any objections to upgrade to slf4j 1.4.0?

2007-06-29 Thread Martijn Dashorst
+1 On 6/29/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We are on 1.3.1 now but i see there is a 1.4.0 and i have to use it anyway in another project (thats also using wicket) so i could also upgrade wicket to 1.4.0 johan -- Wicket joins the Apache Software Foundation as Apache Wicket Joi

any objections to upgrade to slf4j 1.4.0?

2007-06-29 Thread Johan Compagner
We are on 1.3.1 now but i see there is a 1.4.0 and i have to use it anyway in another project (thats also using wicket) so i could also upgrade wicket to 1.4.0 johan