shutting down wicket-stuff lists?

2007-02-06 Thread Eelco Hillenius
Hi, How do you feel about shutting down the wicket-stuff lists (wicket-stuff-develop@lists.sourceforge.net, [EMAIL PROTECTED])? I think traffic is too low to really justify having separate lists, and traffic likely will be of interest to subscribers of the core lists as well. If we just shut them

Re: shutting down wicket-stuff lists?

2007-02-07 Thread Al Maw
Eelco Hillenius wrote: How do you feel about shutting down the wicket-stuff lists (wicket-stuff-develop@lists.sourceforge.net, [EMAIL PROTECTED])? I think traffic is too low to really justify having separate lists, and traffic likely will be of interest to subscribers of the core lists as well. I

Re: shutting down wicket-stuff lists?

2007-02-07 Thread James McLaughlin
It might be worthwhile to keep wicket-stuff-develop so that when it comes time to coordinate a release or encourage wicket-stuff-developers to make some changes (like mavenizing their projects) we won't pollute wicket-user. But for this to work, we would need to make sure all the project maintaine

Re: shutting down wicket-stuff lists?

2007-02-07 Thread Al Maw
James McLaughlin wrote: > It might be worthwhile to keep wicket-stuff-develop so that when it > comes time to coordinate a release or encourage > wicket-stuff-developers to make some changes (like mavenizing their > projects) we won't pollute wicket-user. But for this to work, we would > need to m

Re: shutting down wicket-stuff lists?

2007-02-07 Thread James McLaughlin
No doubt that would be great for making announcements regarding project releases and what not, but for coordinating work I think we would need more back and forth than an rss feed could provide. I'm cool with it either way, though. On 2/7/07, Al Maw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: James McLaughlin w

Re: shutting down wicket-stuff lists?

2007-02-07 Thread Eelco Hillenius
but for coordinating work I think we would need more back and forth than an rss feed could provide. I'm cool with it either way, though. For that we can keep using this list and the user list. There's usually an overlap between all those projects and the core project anyway. Eelco

Re: shutting down wicket-stuff lists?

2007-02-07 Thread Martijn Dashorst
Hmm, I think we resolved at the start of incubation that sf.net things for wicket-stuff such as lists, issue trackers and wiki's should remain outside ASF. This would mean that we rollback the list part of that decision. I don't mind as the traffic on those list is /really/ minimal. Martijn O

Re: shutting down wicket-stuff lists?

2007-02-07 Thread James McLaughlin
Agreed. +1 I only brought this up becuase some of us have been reluctant to create noise on the mailing lists, to the degree that we have contacted each other off list. jim On 2/7/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > but for coordinating work I think we > would need more back and f

Re: shutting down wicket-stuff lists?

2007-02-07 Thread Martijn Dashorst
I'd rather have that traffic on the user/dev lists where everybody listens :) Martijn On 2/7/07, James McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Agreed. +1 I only brought this up becuase some of us have been reluctant to create noise on the mailing lists, to the degree that we have contacted each

Re: shutting down wicket-stuff lists?

2007-02-07 Thread Eelco Hillenius
This would mean that we rollback the list part of that decision. Yep. Sorry about that. I just noticed that there was an unanswered question lingering around for days; obviously because hardly anyone of the wicket-stuff people actually is subscribed. Furthermore, I think that even though it is t

Re: shutting down wicket-stuff lists?

2007-02-07 Thread Eelco Hillenius
On 2/7/07, James McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Agreed. +1 I only brought this up becuase some of us have been reluctant to create noise on the mailing lists, to the degree that we have contacted each other off list. If you can get there, ##wicket on freenode.net is a great way to reduc

Re: shutting down wicket-stuff lists?

2007-02-07 Thread Vincent Demay
+1 Eelco Hillenius a écrit : On 2/7/07, James McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Agreed. +1 I only brought this up becuase some of us have been reluctant to create noise on the mailing lists, to the degree that we have contacted each other off list. If you can get there, ##wicket on freen

Re: shutting down wicket-stuff lists?

2007-02-07 Thread Jean-Baptiste Quenot
* Eelco Hillenius: > > How do you feel about shutting down the wicket-stuff lists > (wicket-stuff-develop@lists.sourceforge.net, > [EMAIL PROTECTED])? +1 Didn't event know they existed -- Jean-Baptiste Quenot aka John Banana Qwerty http://caraldi.com/jbq/

Re: shutting down wicket-stuff lists?

2007-02-07 Thread Eelco Hillenius
And you're in the top 3 of committers for wicket-stuff! :) Eelco On 2/7/07, Jean-Baptiste Quenot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: * Eelco Hillenius: > > How do you feel about shutting down the wicket-stuff lists > (wicket-stuff-develop@lists.sourceforge.net, > [EMAIL PROTECTED])? +1 Didn't event k