Ah, yes. True. It used to resolve local includes using
javax.servlet.RequestDispatcher, i which case including request
attributes would work. However, that proved to be quite problametic
and we changed it to always use the absolute requests.
What you need shouldn't be too hard however. But it is n
If I come up with anything useful I'd be happy to contribute. The JSP I
need to "forward" to requires request attributes, so I don't think the
wicket.markup.html.include.Include component will work as from what I
understand it is a separate request whose output is then included into
the markup?
#: Eelco Hillenius changed the world a bit at a time by saying on 11/6/2005
9:38 PM :#
I see absolutely nothing wrong with lookups at that level. It's less
code than you would need for any component configuration and it's more
efficient too. And there are just no disadvantages, are there?
And.
Sure. Use wicket.markup.html.pages.RedirectPage for server-side
redirecting to a non-wicket locations. If you want to inlcude things
likes JSP pages into Wicket pages, you can use the
wicket.markup.html.include.Include component. The latter is a bit
rough, so if you need better support on that one,
got access to a laptop, and just checked it in.
its in wicket-stuff/wicketeer
as i said this is my first go at an eclipse plugin so im sure the code isnt as elegant as it could be
right now it handles all basic cases, like renaming a class that inherits from markup container and renaming an inn
I'm exploring the possibility of integrating Wicket into a JSP
application. Is it possible to tell Wicket to do a servlet forward to a
JSP? I would like to add a few request attributes and then forward to a
JSP. The reason I'd like to do a forward VS include is I need to be
able to populate req
No, but I work wih CVS only. I don't download the jars. And I modify
project.xmll to use the snapshot jar which I build myself.
Juergen
On 11/6/05, jan_bar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I use DiffUtil. The extension may help. You don't have troubles with it?
>
> Jan
>
> "Juergen Donnerstag" <[EMAI
I see absolutely nothing wrong with lookups at that level. It's less
code than you would need for any component configuration and it's more
efficient too. And there are just no disadvantages, are there?
And... for this whole discussion: if you like one approach... go
implement it now! Create your
you are right, this is not ioc. but are pages/components managed by an ioc container?
-Igor
On 11/6/05, Alexandru Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
#: Igor Vaynberg changed the world a bit at a time by saying on 11/6/2005 7:06 PM :#> Or how about a simple solution:>> public MyApplication extends
I use DiffUtil. The extension may help. You don't have troubles with it?
Jan
"Juergen Donnerstag" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Are you using DiffPrint which we use for core unit tests? May be we
just have to extend this class
Juergen
On 11/5/05, jan_bar <[EMAIL P
#: Igor Vaynberg changed the world a bit at a time by saying on 11/6/2005 7:06
PM :#
Or how about a simple solution:
public MyApplication extends WebApplication {
public Object lookup(String name) {
Object=...do a lookup from somewhere like spring context or app object...;
return object;
}
}
i will check it in tonight.
-Igor
On 11/6/05, Andrew Berman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Definitely would be nice.On 11/6/05, Martijn Dashorst <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
H YEAH!MartijnOn 11/6/05, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi guys, ive been doing some refactoring lately and g
Or how about a simple solution:
public MyApplication extends WebApplication {
public Object lookup(String name) {
Object=...do a lookup from somewhere like spring context or app object...;
return object;
}
}
public MyPage extends Page {
public transient SomeService service;
Definitely would be nice.On 11/6/05, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
H YEAH!MartijnOn 11/6/05, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> Hi guys, ive been doing some refactoring lately and got really tired of
> renaming the .html and .properties file after i renamed the page or
Sounds and looks good to me. On 11/6/05, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think the way to go would be to have a set of components that work like CheckGroup/Check
we can have a Select component that acts like the CheckGroup component,
and a SelectChoices component that works like the dro
That's why you wrap the border calls:http://www.wicket-wiki.org.uk/wiki/index.php/Consistent_page_layout_using_borders
On 11/6/05, Johan Maasing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The problem is that the "message"-label does not belong to the pageanymore. It belongs to the "border" so you have to add the m
2005/11/6, Alexandru Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> #: Eduardo Rocha changed the world a bit at a time by saying on 11/6/2005
> 3:51 PM :#
> > I think Christian's idea is nice, and I saw at least three comments against
> > it:
> >
> > 1. It is necessary to call injectDependencies on deserializat
Hi,
I'm doing some AJAX-stuff, and because there is not yet real support of
rendering single components (and having a URL for a Component) I'm doing
all this stuff with a AjaxWrapperPage like
public class AjaxWrapperPage extends WebPage {
public AjaxFieldResult(Component component) {
#: Eduardo Rocha changed the world a bit at a time by saying on 11/6/2005 3:51
PM :#
I think Christian's idea is nice, and I saw at least three comments against it:
1. It is necessary to call injectDependencies on deserialization (Igor)
If a component implements "protected Object readResolve(
"Make it final?"
I personally dislike Wicket's final methods, but I would like to read
people's opinion :) - and in this case it is the easiest way.
2005/11/6, Eduardo Rocha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I think Christian's idea is nice, and I saw at least three comments against
> it:
>
> 1. It is nece
I think Christian's idea is nice, and I saw at least three comments against it:
1. It is necessary to call injectDependencies on deserialization (Igor)
If a component implements "protected Object readResolve() throws
ObjectStreamException", as specified in Serializable class, I think
this could b
>
> To add on, I found that the following css is missing in the head tag when the
> problem occurs.
>
>
href="/cms/ex_card/resources/wicket.contrib.markup.html.navmenu.style.tabs.TabsS
> tyle/tabs-folders.css" type="text/css" rel="stylesheet"
> wicket:id="cssStyleResource"/>
>
>href
yongbl yahoo.com.sg> writes:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I have tried to use the navmenu in my project sucessfully. However, when I
click on a tree's node, the navmenu disappeared. Any idea how I can solved this?
>
> Regards,
> James Yong
>
>
> Do you Yahoo!?New and Improved Yahoo! Mail
Hi,
I have tried to use the navmenu in my project sucessfully. However, when I click on a tree's node, the navmenu disappeared. Any idea how I can solved this?
Regards,
James Yong
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 1GB free storage!
H YEAH!
Martijn
On 11/6/05, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi guys, ive been doing some refactoring lately and got really tired of
> renaming the .html and .properties file after i renamed the page or panel
> class. This sucks especially when you have inner classes and you ha
that looks nice and handyOn 11/6/05, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi guys, ive been doing some refactoring lately and got really tired of
renaming the .html and .properties file after i renamed the page or
panel class. This sucks especially when you have inner classes and you
have to re
Nick Heudecker wrote:
Didn't work. So I have a Border component with the following markup:
Then I have a Page with the following markup:
And the error is: "There must be exactly one tag for
each
border compoment." Well, I have exactly one tag for
I just started learning wicke
I think the way to go would be to have a set of components that work like CheckGroup/Check
we can have a Select component that acts like the CheckGroup component,
and a SelectChoices component that works like the dropdownchoice with
the exception of rendering tags. We also have a
SelectChoicesGrou
I'm be interested
Juergen
On 11/6/05, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi guys, ive been doing some refactoring lately and got really tired of
> renaming the .html and .properties file after i renamed the page or panel
> class. This sucks especially when you have inner classes and you h
Hi guys, ive been doing some refactoring lately and got really tired of
renaming the .html and .properties file after i renamed the page or
panel class. This sucks especially when you have inner classes and you
have to rename all inner resources like SomePage$SomeInnerPanel.html
I created a small
It shouldn't. I guess the important point is that
ComponentStringResourceLoade does not get the FormComponent (text1)
You don't start looking for text1 in the formComponents properties
file, do you? You start with the parent component containing text1. A
key text1 expresses that text1 is a child of
31 matches
Mail list logo
