Hey all - just trying to build wicket from HEAD. First up I notice it doesn't build with maven 2 so using maven 1.I'm trying the "dist" goal which seems to do all its stuff, then starts running through a bunch of JUnit tests which eventually fail which leaves me without a
wicket.jar (that may be
does anyone have any experience with tigris? i think that is a promising choice if we were to move.-IgorOn 12/9/05, Eelco Hillenius <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Yeah. I'm not in favor of
Java.net either, though I think there are acouple of projects using java.net just for CVS. I think the rest of SF
Yeah. I'm not in favor of Java.net either, though I think there are a
couple of projects using java.net just for CVS. I think the rest of SF
is okay. Just annon cvs access that sucks.
We came from codehaus after being frustraded with the fact that it
took weeks to even get me assigned commit right
Please don't go to java.net... I've never seen a project page there that looked even remotely usable.Beyond that, I'm not sure. How has JavaForge been working out?On 12/9/05,
Andrew Lombardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey All,I've been actively following the latest builds with Igor on IRC withwic
Hey All,
I've been actively following the latest builds with Igor on IRC with
wicket-extensions, and the newest wicket HEAD releases with the
pretty url's, etc. And we've both expressed this, as you all
probably have..
sourceforge is pretty much unreliable at best.
anonymous CVS never wo
thanksforgot to mention, there is also the RefreshingView which refreshes on every request for for those who didnt know about it already.-IgorOn 12/9/05,
Christian Essl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Wow that's realy cool with the toolbars boosts productivity.Thanks,ChristianOn Fri, 9 Dec 2005 00:26:2
Wow that's realy cool with the toolbars boosts productivity.
Thanks,
Christian
On Fri, 9 Dec 2005 00:26:25 -0800, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
the repeaters refactoring is pretty much complete so the api should be
stable (possibly with the exception of the new table.filter packag
Sorry the 'variable scoping' was misleading it is more like field scoping
in Class hierarchies or the field/method-variable scoping within one class.
As I imagine this would work:
MyPage(){
add(new Label("hidden-by-cont1","hidden"));
add(new Label("global","can be everywhere")); //the intrestin
better said is that id is then the same as a _javascript_/css id in the html page.It must be unqiue over a page itself.But one thing, if you use listviews/repeaters or something like that you will generated components with the same id.
But that is in youre case i think not a big problem because tho
the repeaters refactoring is pretty much complete so the api should be stable (possibly with the exception of the new table.filter package)there are a few api breaks, but nothing major. also i moved things around a little bit so might want to run the organize imports command in your ide.
changes:fa
10 matches
Mail list logo
