No, it is not expected. Would you please copy the unit test and send
it to me. I make sure it'll work in 1.2
Juergen
On 4/11/06, Gustavo Hexsel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm using Wicket 1.1.1 and trying to get my first WicketTester to work with
the current app. I can't seem to get
please open a bug report in sourceforge.
Juergen
On 4/11/06, nato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wicket adds script element which is not a valid html 4 or xhtml because it
does not specify the type attribute. I think it's a bug.
---
This SF.Net
We did defer it as long as possible until 1 or 2 days ago and we dropped that again. Because it is almost not doable and it is currently not very easy to make a completely stateless website with wicket anyway.
But that is just the default behaviour. You could if you want make youre own
Hi all,
On my company, we have an issue with
wicket 2.0 beta 3 and Resin 3.0.18.
After resin is active for a while, a
stack trace occurs in the logfile with the following exception ...
FileNotFoundException (Too many open
files). The exception occurs multiple times.
We have tested with our own
The CSS attribute empty-cells: show
works in Mozilla, but not in IE 6.0 are there any work-arounds?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Heudecker
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 4:12
PM
To:
wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
It works in IE as well, depending on the contents of the TD. Can you paste a bit of the markup?On 4/11/06, Frank Silbermann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The CSS attribute 'empty-cells: show'
works in Mozilla, but not in IE 6.0 – are there any work-arounds?
-Original
OK, this doesn't appear to work. I finally got around to testing this
and I still get a
LazyInitializationException.
I passed the model around and it's barfing.
main page (ViewBlog.class):
//get object graph in detachable model
IModel blogModel = new
you are still not using a model for the listview, you are binding the listview to hibernate's lazy initializable set instead in this line:add(new ListView(categoriesView, ((Blog)getModelObject())
.getCategories())try changing that to:add(new ListView(categoriesView, new PropertyModel(blogModel,
I changed the param to look like yours:
new PropertyModel(blogModel, categories)
...and I get the same exception...no luck!
On 4/11/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you are still not using a model for the listview, you are binding the
listview to hibernate's lazy initializable set
You need Open Session In View -- http://www.hibernate.org/43.htmlOn 4/11/06, Igor Vaynberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:in that case your container's persistence mechanism is closing the underlying hibernate session after the end of the invocation? this is a container specific problem not a wicket
Yes...if I were using plain Hibernate and not EJB3...like I explained
in my first post. I need another way of making this work (as Igor
said...a way to keep the session open somehow in the container) - a
way that wouldn't require any Hibernate-specific coding...
I've built several plain
Juergen gave me some pointers and I decided to try migrating to 1.2. I have
to say things are quite a bit more complicated now... how do I get access to
the request from an AuthorizationStrategy? I need to check if the request's IP
is within a pre-configured range. Before, I was doing
RequestCycle.get().getRequest()..-IgorOn 4/11/06, Gustavo Hexsel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:Juergen gave me some pointers and I decided to try migrating to 1.2.I have to say things are quite a bit more complicated now...how do I get access to the request from an AuthorizationStrategy?I need to
you could wrap a transaction around the render phase)
(and also around the event processing phase, or both, depending on your
RenderStrategy)
The key is:
UserTransaction ut = (UserTransaction) new
InitialContext().lookup(java:comp/UserTransaction);
But you may need to reattach beans to the
Hi all,
I've found out this web maillist reader, thought it's nice:
httP://www.nabble.com
you can check wicket's by this link:
http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-f13974.html
by the way, wicket's maillist ranks currently as third in sourceforge's most
active maillists! Congrats for such a great
I actually haven't been able to get this to happen, but the
jsessionid should be on all of the bookmarkable URLs on the first
hit. I understand that google will crawl a site that has sessions to
some extent, but you won't compete with sites that don't have
jsessionid in the URLs when it
but it is up to wicket.We do call response.encodeUrl if we don't do that then jsessionid is not inserted into the url.But if we don't do that then sessions could be lost when a browser has cookies disabled..
johanOn 4/11/06, Nathan Hamblen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Day wrote: If not, then
Off the top of my head, because you are likely using an older version
of Wicket where we did not encode the URL. I believe that was a bug ;)
The most current version always encodes the URL. Remember, if you do not
encode the URL, you risk losing the session without warning.
Gili
Michael
Mine is also not adding the session to the URL. Isn't this automatically
handled by the servlet engine (tomcat or jetty) without wicket or programmer
intervention? That's probably why some of us don't see it... browser brand and
version versus servlet engine version.
[]s Gus
The problem is that:
1) GoogleBot will hit the same page with different JSESSIONID each time.
It'll think that these are different pages and lower your page rank
because (from its point of view) your website contains different page
URLs with the same content (looks like you're trying to
Is there a way to test the final result of an attribute modifier? I'm using
them to set the src attribute of some img tags, set parameters on certain
javascript functions, etc. But I haven't seen any example of how to validate
if it's working correctly.
Thanks!
[]s Gus
No it is because what gili says. Not all urls where encoded in previous versions of wicket.Now they are and no it is up to us to call the right method on the response object so that the url gets encoded.It is not auto handles how can they do that? Analyse the complete generated html and see what a
see our unit tests.Just generate the page output in a WicketUnitTest and compare it what you expect.johanOn 4/11/06, Gustavo Hexsel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Is there a way to test the final result of an attribute modifier?I'm using them to set the src attribute of some img tags, set parameters on
I'm using resin with wicket 1.2-beta3... Isn't it fixed in this version?
On Apr 11, 2006, at 5:33 PM, cowwoc wrote:
* PGP Signed by an unknown key: 04/11/06 at 17:33:36
Off the top of my head, because you are likely using an older version
of Wicket where we did not encode the URL. I
I think it is possible, but as you can read from Martijn's reply and
the issue I created for this just today, not for this release, as it
means an API break.
See (and track)
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1468853group_id=119783atid=684975
Eelco
On 4/11/06, Michael Day
you have to setup a mock request cycle and request/response just like wicket tester does in order to render components.-IgorOn 4/11/06, Gustavo Hexsel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RequestCycle.get() returns null for me.This is my testing code (the HeaderPanelSource just stores some attributes needed
I think you're being overeager here. There is no good reason for
disallowing normal users with cookies disabled to not use URL rewriting.
Stripping JSESSIONID *only* for crawlers still sounds like the best
workaround/hack to me.
Gili
Nathan Hamblen wrote:
cowwoc wrote:
1) GoogleBot
Using robots.txt isn't really an option because correctly all Wicket
pages require a Session. You are right that all these suggestions are
nothing more than workarounds and ideally we should be deferring Session
creation inside Wicket... somehow :)
Gili
Michael Day wrote:
On Apr 11,
Hi wicketeers
I have a small problem with DropDownChoice that I have been staring
at for hours...
Now I have a ListView containing two textfields (working fine!) and a
dropdownbox. And this is my problem.
==
add (new ListView(partnerListe, partner){
I've got some legacy PDFs laying around that utilize the HTTP submit
functionality available when using Acrobat fillable forms. The servlet
I have answering these Acrobat requests saves off the field names and
values submitted in a 3 column table (rec id, field name, value). We
change the
So, when I reference these persistent child collections, won't they
also need to be wrapped in a detachable model, i.e. when they're
passed to a ListView? Or, because they're child objects of an already
detachable model, are they detached?
On 4/11/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ah,
Here's what my servlet does, minus the Hibernate code:
pre
protected void doPost(HttpServletRequest arg0, HttpServletResponse arg1)
throws ServletException, IOException {
Enumeration e = arg0.getParameterNames();
while (e.hasMoreElements()) {
String parm = (String)
32 matches
Mail list logo
