Hi Igor,
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
i thought he explained why...because they need to be able to take down
one of the nodes and install a different version on it. the static
resources might be different between two versions.
Indeed, my point exactly. :)
the problem is that this is really
Hi Igor,
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
the problem is that this is really outside of wicket's domain because
these are static and not wicket-related resources you are talking about?
so if you have img src=images/foo.gif/ you want jsessionid appended
to that? i guess you can use a filter to
to resolve the issue, but I'm unsure if this will cause any other
issues, so I would appreciate any suggestions or feedback.
Kind regards,
/james
===
James Carnegie
Senior Analyst Programmer/Development Team Leader
Tel
().encodeURL(buffer);
and at that point we don't know that it becomes an redirect url or a
normal link...
So the question is what is the end result? What does encodeRedirectURL
do and return?
even if encodeURL is already called before on that same url?
johan
On 12/13/06, *James Carnegie
Hi all,
This problem has cropped up a couple of times on this list.
Do you think we should add it to the Gotchas section of the wiki?
just my 2 cents. :)
/j.
Flemming Boller wrote:
I am glad to help you :-)
On 11/27/06, *Nino Wael* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Dipu,
I don't know the answer to your problem, but I am experiencing it too
and would be very interested in learning about any solutions you find.
Customers need to be able to specify what URL's look like, so the Wicket
framework should _not_ dictate this.
Can someone explain why we cannot
(the filter) doesn't want this request.
so servlet mapping of /* is strongly not recommended!!
johan
On 11/16/06, * James Carnegie* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Dipu,
I don't know the answer to your problem, but I am
/servlet when we (the
filter) doesn't want this request.
so servlet mapping of /* is strongly not recommended!!
johan
On 11/16/06, *James Carnegie* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Dipu,
I don't know the answer to your problem, but I am experiencing