Re: [Wicket-user] AjaxLink setresponse

2006-08-19 Thread Frank Bille
With only 2x+1? Are you crazy?!? I need to have something like 4½x+1 and max. 1x0 and no -1 (or something)- FrankOn 8/18/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: no, wicket_1_2_1 branch was a mistake - it is supposed to be a label that marks the code that went into 1.2.1 release not a branch -

Re: [Wicket-user] AjaxLink setresponse

2006-08-18 Thread samyem
I guess I do not have the latest version. I am trying to use the trunk version and almost all my code broke due to Component's constructor signature change. thanks Anyway. igor.vaynberg wrote: RequestCycle.java: /** * Returns a URL that references the given page. It also *

Re: [Wicket-user] AjaxLink setresponse

2006-08-18 Thread Eelco Hillenius
For 1.2 you have to use the wicket_1_2 branch. Eelco On 8/18/06, samyem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I guess I do not have the latest version. I am trying to use the trunk version and almost all my code broke due to Component's constructor signature change. thanks Anyway. igor.vaynberg

Re: [Wicket-user] AjaxLink setresponse

2006-08-18 Thread samyem
Okay that's fine. We were using the 1.2.1 release jars and not from SVN. So is it okay if i check out from wicket_1_2_1 branch instead of wicket_1_2 branch? igor.vaynberg wrote: let me restate with some highlighting :) if you update to latest code from svn *wicket_1_2 branch*

Re: [Wicket-user] AjaxLink setresponse

2006-08-18 Thread Igor Vaynberg
no, wicket_1_2_1 branch was a mistake - it is supposed to be a label that marks the code that went into 1.2.1 release not a branch - but maven made a booboo.frank i thought you were gonna move it to tags? if you want the latest you should check out from wicket_1_2 branch.-IgorOn 8/18/06, samyem

Re: [Wicket-user] AjaxLink setresponse

2006-08-18 Thread samyem
Okay that explains all my confusions. thanks. igor.vaynberg wrote: no, wicket_1_2_1 branch was a mistake - it is supposed to be a label that marks the code that went into 1.2.1 release not a branch - but maven made a booboo. frank i thought you were gonna move it to tags? if you

Re: [Wicket-user] AjaxLink setresponse

2006-08-17 Thread Igor Vaynberg
if you update to latest code from svn wicket_1_2 branch setresponsepage() will work. if you cannot upgrade then you have to do target.appendJavascript(window.location=+urlFor(page, IRedirectListener.INTERFACE)); -IgorOn 8/17/06, samyem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What do I need to do to go to a

Re: [Wicket-user] AjaxLink setresponse

2006-08-17 Thread samyem
Unlike setResponsePage, urlFor does not seem to take an instance of a Page, but only Class. What if I want to pass an instance of Page itself? igor.vaynberg wrote: if you update to latest code from svn wicket_1_2 branch setresponsepage() will work. if you cannot upgrade then you have to do

Re: [Wicket-user] AjaxLink setresponse

2006-08-17 Thread Igor Vaynberg
RequestCycle.java: /** * Returns a URL that references the given page. It also * [EMAIL PROTECTED] Session#touch(Page) touches} the page in the session so that it is * put in the front of the page stack. Use this method only if you plan to * use it the next request. * * @param page * The page *