Re: [Wicket-user] AuthorizeAction and !Role

2007-07-25 Thread David Leangen
> > I would like to submit a patch for this... > The component should be in there though. It currently doesn't have any > issues assigned, so it doesn't show up on the front page, but if you > create a new issue, you should be able to select it. Ok, you're right Eelco. I'm honoured to be the fi

Re: [Wicket-user] AuthorizeAction and !Role

2007-07-25 Thread Eelco Hillenius
> I would like to submit a patch for this, but I can't see where I need to > do this... > > I can see that the issue tracker is now Jira set up on the Apache > infrastructure, but there is currently no component for > "wicket-auth-roles". The component should be in there though. It currently doesn

Re: [Wicket-user] AuthorizeAction and !Role

2007-07-25 Thread David Leangen
I would like to submit a patch for this, but I can't see where I need to do this... I can see that the issue tracker is now Jira set up on the Apache infrastructure, but there is currently no component for "wicket-auth-roles". Assuming that this is where I need to send in my patch, could somebod

Re: [Wicket-user] AuthorizeAction and !Role

2007-07-11 Thread Eelco Hillenius
> Is there an elegant way to do the opposite of what the AuthorizeAction > annotation was intended for? > > I have an "unregister" function that any user _except_ the admin user > should be able to use. If the admin unregisters, I'm f*. > > Essentially, I'd really like to be able to do somethin

[Wicket-user] AuthorizeAction and !Role

2007-07-04 Thread David Leangen
Is there an elegant way to do the opposite of what the AuthorizeAction annotation was intended for? I have an "unregister" function that any user _except_ the admin user should be able to use. If the admin unregisters, I'm f*. Essentially, I'd really like to be able to do something like this