My connection just timed out... ah... different time zones :)
Martijn
On 3/1/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> uhmno thankswho would want to be the head of something so broken?
> wouldnt be a fun place to be i would imagine :)
>
>
> -Igor
>
>
> On 3/1/06, Eelco Hillenius <[E
uhmno thankswho would want to be the head of something so broken? wouldnt be a fun place to be i would imagine :)-IgorOn 3/1/06, Eelco Hillenius
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Igor, head of cvs :)On 3/1/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> arent they one and the same?>> -Igor>>>
> On
arent they one and the same?-IgorOn 3/1/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Your's or CVS? ;)On 3/1/06, Igor Vaynberg <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> done in head>>> -Igor>>> On 3/1/06, Nick Heudecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > Yeah, that will work very well.> >> >> >> > On 3/1/06, I
Igor, head of cvs :)
On 3/1/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> arent they one and the same?
>
> -Igor
>
>
>
> On 3/1/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> Your's or CVS? ;)
>
> On 3/1/06, Igor Vaynberg < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > done in head
> >
> >
> > -Igor
> >
>
Your's or CVS? ;)
On 3/1/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> done in head
>
>
> -Igor
>
>
> On 3/1/06, Nick Heudecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Yeah, that will work very well.
> >
> >
> >
> > On 3/1/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > with my recent refacto
done in head-IgorOn 3/1/06, Nick Heudecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yeah, that will work very well.On 3/1/06, Igor Vaynberg
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
with my recent refactorings i can add another key to be searched that is "TypeValidator".Typeso keys like TypeValidator.BigDecimal will take pri
Yeah, that will work very well.On 3/1/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
with my recent refactorings i can add another key to be searched that is "TypeValidator".Typeso keys like TypeValidator.BigDecimal will take priority over TypeValidator
that way you can create the keys for different
then he would have to write his own TypeValidator. currently we perform type conversion internally (w/out typevalidator which is deprecated now) so i dont see how he can override that.best thing i can do is search for different keys.
-IgorOn 3/1/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You ca
You can override method messageModel to deliver your own map.
Eelco
On 3/1/06, Nick Heudecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> TypeValidator adds a "${type}" key for validation messages. Is there any
> way to customize this for the specific case? For instance, I use
> TypeValidator for BigDecimals
with my recent refactorings i can add another key to be searched that is "TypeValidator".Typeso keys like TypeValidator.BigDecimal will take priority over TypeValidatorthat way you can create the keys for different types.
sound good?-IgorOn 3/1/06, Nick Heudecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
TypeVali
TypeValidator adds a "${type}" key for validation messages. Is there any way to customize this for the specific case? For instance, I use TypeValidator for BigDecimals and Dates. I don't want my users seeing "
java.math.BigDecimal" or "java.util.Date" in the validation messages.Thanks for your t
11 matches
Mail list logo
