yep you are right :).
thanks,
Karthik
On 2/13/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i think this is actually a firebug bug :) try with it disabled
-igor
On 2/12/07, karthik Guru < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Matej,
>
> Here is something that I observed in FireBug -
>
> ==
i think this is actually a firebug bug :) try with it disabled
-igor
On 2/12/07, karthik Guru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Matej,
Here is something that I observed in FireBug -
=
t has no properties
stateChangeCallback()wicket-ajax.js
Hi Matej,
Here is something that I observed in FireBug -
=
t has no properties
stateChangeCallback()wicket-ajax.js (line 627)
bind()wicket-ajax.js (line 36)
(no name)(XMLHttpRequest, "POST",
"/wicket-examples/verical?wicket:interface=wicket
nope.
can you provide content of ajax console? (if any)
-Matej
karthik Guru wrote:
> Any known issue with wicket-ajax and Mozilla 2.0?
> I have an Ajax checkbox that doesn't seem to trigger the Ajax request.
> But it seems to be working fine with IE 6 and FF 1.5
>
> thanks,
> Karthik
>
>
> ---
Any known issue with wicket-ajax and Mozilla 2.0?
I have an Ajax checkbox that doesn't seem to trigger the Ajax request.
But it seems to be working fine with IE 6 and FF 1.5
thanks,
Karthik
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more?
