Re: [Wicket-user] Fwd: FW: UI Framework selection

2007-01-20 Thread Scott Swank
Mighty slick, and much appreciated. On 1/20/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > An example: > > Map variables = new HashMap CharSequence>(7); > variables.put("javaScriptId", javaScriptId); > variables.put("backGroundElementId", backgroun

Re: [Wicket-user] Fwd: FW: UI Framework selection

2007-01-20 Thread Eelco Hillenius
An example: Map variables = new HashMap(7); variables.put("javaScriptId", javaScriptId); variables.put("backGroundElementId", backgroundElementId); variables.put("imageElementId", imageElementId); variables.put("leftUp

Re: [Wicket-user] Fwd: FW: UI Framework selection

2007-01-19 Thread Scott Swank
Very kind, thank you. So JavaScriptTemplate defines foo as a document-level object? Nice. Much appreciated. Scott On 1/19/07, Nathan Hamblen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What, you're deciding between Wicket and JSF and no one has answered > your question? Unacceptable! > > JavaScriptTemplate i

Re: [Wicket-user] Fwd: FW: UI Framework selection

2007-01-19 Thread Nathan Hamblen
What, you're deciding between Wicket and JSF and no one has answered your question? Unacceptable! JavaScriptTemplate is good for passing variables into Javascript. You can use a cache buster to make sure it gets loaded each time. So, with that approach you would have a plain onclick="oldJavaScript

Re: [Wicket-user] Fwd: FW: UI Framework selection

2007-01-19 Thread Scott Swank
I'll know in two weeks. Starting Monday we spend two weeks building proof-of-concept apps in Wicket & JSF/Facelets. If Wicket comes out on top then I'm pretty confident that the answer is a "yes". Cheers, Scott On 1/19/07, Nino Wael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Scott, you still interested in h

Re: [Wicket-user] Fwd: FW: UI Framework selection

2007-01-19 Thread Nino Wael
Scott, you still interested in hiring some wicket expertise? regards Nino <>- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT

Re: [Wicket-user] Fwd: FW: UI Framework selection

2007-01-18 Thread Scott Swank
Thank you both. On 1/17/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Good luck! Keep us informed, and of course I hope Wicket will be good for you > :) > > Eelco > > On 1/17/07, Scott Swank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Wish me luck. Vegas.com will be selecting our web UI framework in the >

Re: [Wicket-user] Fwd: FW: UI Framework selection

2007-01-17 Thread Eelco Hillenius
Good luck! Keep us informed, and of course I hope Wicket will be good for you :) Eelco On 1/17/07, Scott Swank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wish me luck. Vegas.com will be selecting our web UI framework in the > next few weeks and the candidates are JSF Facelets & Wicket. This > will be for a c

Re: [Wicket-user] Fwd: FW: UI Framework selection

2007-01-17 Thread Igor Vaynberg
not that we know of. its just a servlet/filter. -igor On 1/17/07, Scott Swank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Wish me luck. Vegas.com will be selecting our web UI framework in the next few weeks and the candidates are JSF Facelets & Wicket. This will be for a complete UI re-write of our public we

[Wicket-user] Fwd: FW: UI Framework selection

2007-01-17 Thread Scott Swank
Wish me luck. Vegas.com will be selecting our web UI framework in the next few weeks and the candidates are JSF Facelets & Wicket. This will be for a complete UI re-write of our public website. My apologies in advance for the onslaught of borderline-inane questions to which I will undoubtedly su