>
> Maybe this simple addition should also be backported to 1.3
Sounds good to me.
Eelco
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opin
On 2/13/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For some cases it is easier, more efficient or - as with behaviors -
simply the only way to write markup 'around' (before and after) the
actual tag that a component is coupled to. This is where
response.write can be used.
wrapping around
On 2/14/07, Robert . <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 2/13/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > For some cases it is easier, more efficient or - as with behaviors -
> > simply the only way to write markup 'around' (before and after) the
> > actual tag that a component is coupled to
On 2/13/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For some cases it is easier, more efficient or - as with behaviors -
simply the only way to write markup 'around' (before and after) the
actual tag that a component is coupled to. This is where
response.write can be used.
Is this also the
For some cases it is easier, more efficient or - as with behaviors -
simply the only way to write markup 'around' (before and after) the
actual tag that a component is coupled to. This is where
response.write can be used.
The interface to that could be made more to-the-purpose so that it you
can h
Yes, that's the example I am talking about.
BTW the overridden method's name is incorrect. It should be renderChoice
instead of renderChoices.
On 2/13/07, karthik Guru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
this one?
AbstractAutoCompleteRenderer implements IAutoCompleteRenderer{
@Override
protected voi
this one?
AbstractAutoCompleteRenderer implements IAutoCompleteRenderer{
@Override
protected void renderChoices(Object object, Response r) {
String val = ((Email) object).email;
r.write("");
r.write(val);
r.write("");
r.write("" + ((Email) object).getEmailInfo());
r.write("");
}
}
I'm not sure
Actually I encounter this raw HTML output in the Pro Wicket book on page
251.
A custome AutoCompleteRenderer is used to render a choice
protected void renderChoice(Object object, Response response)
Could you give an example how to write custom HTML to the response in such a
method, without having
yeah. pretty much never. in fact, i can't think of a single exceptional
case
where this was necessary outside of the wicket core.
igor.vaynberg wrote:
>
> in wicket you very very very very rarely output markup from your code. why
> do you need this?
>
> -igor
>
>
> On 2/12/07, Robert . <
On 2/12/07, Marc-Andre Houle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't think there is something for that in wicket, but
1. You can use a Label and setEscapeMarkupId(false);
Oops, setEscapeModelStrings
2. You can use simple Label and add a SimpleAttributeModifier.
On 2/12/07, Robert . <[EMAIL
I don't think there is something for that in wicket, but
1. You can use a Label and setEscapeMarkupId(false);
2. You can use simple Label and add a SimpleAttributeModifier.
On 2/12/07, Robert . <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I have been using Tapestry before and kinda enjoyed using the
IM
in wicket you very very very very rarely output markup from your code. why
do you need this?
-igor
On 2/12/07, Robert . <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I have been using Tapestry before and kinda enjoyed using the
IMarkupWriter by doing things like
writer.begin("div");
writer.attribute("id",
Hi,
I have been using Tapestry before and kinda enjoyed using the IMarkupWriter
by doing things like
writer.begin("div");
writer.attribute("id", "abc");
writer.println("text");
writer.end();
Is there an equivalent way of doing this in Wicket?
Robert
-
13 matches
Mail list logo
