why do you really need it?
Do you really want the state pushed to the clients? (Like viewstate of .net)On 9/12/05, Eric Jain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:Eelco Hillenius wrote:> Not yet. Currently Wicket insists on creating session object. We want
> to take a look at this for 1.2, but that will take
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
Not yet. Currently Wicket insists on creating session object. We want
to take a look at this for 1.2, but that will take a couple of months
probably.
Thanks for the information. I'll keep an eye on Wicket then :-)
---
Not yet. Currently Wicket insists on creating session object. We want
to take a look at this for 1.2, but that will take a couple of months
probably.
Eelco
On 9/12/05, Eric Jain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can Wicket be used for stateless web applications? (Or does it insist on
> creating sessi
Can Wicket be used for stateless web applications? (Or does it insist on
creating session objects?)
---
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practi
