The functionality has recently been added to the core and is now
available in CVS head. Please see the Wiki as well for a (very) short
introduction on how to do it.
Juergen
On 4/18/05, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That certainly would be nice functionality.
>
> Alternatives (for
That certainly would be nice functionality.
Alternatives (for now):
- use a filter (I thought that was mentioned in an earlier discussion as
well);
- put you webapplication in a frameset, so that the user doesn't see the
urls.
Eelco
Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
no, not yet, but an RFE has already b
no, not yet, but an RFE has already been filed for that
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1169374&group_id=119783&atid=684978
Juergen
On 4/18/05, Matthew Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is kind of a weird question:
>
> Is it possible with wicket to encode the gene
This is kind of a weird question:
Is it possible with wicket to encode the generated URL's so that to an
end user no package and working details are exposed...?
i.e. Looking at a couple of URL's from the examples:
http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/library?bookmarkablePage=wicket.exam
