Re: [Wicket-user] Why is FileResourceStream final?

2005-09-14 Thread Phil Kulak
And we see how easilly it can all be taken away again. :D On 9/14/05, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i think we should jonathan look at the FileResourceStream now. > I think he can think of some methods to make final now ;) > lik getContentType() ;) > > > On 9/14/05, Eelco Hille

Re: [Wicket-user] Why is FileResourceStream final?

2005-09-14 Thread Francis Amanfo
And in a more terse biblical wording: Ask and ye shall be given. :) FrancisOn 9/14/05, Scott Sauyet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> = Scott Sauyet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > = Eelco Hillenius>> Is there a good reason to have FileResourceStream final?  [ ... ] > I made it non-final. Ask and you s

Re: [Wicket-user] Why is FileResourceStream final?

2005-09-14 Thread Johan Compagner
i think we should jonathan look at the FileResourceStream now. I think he can think of some methods to make final now ;) lik getContentType() ;) On 9/14/05, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: That's not a certainty though. We tend to be carefull when opening up the API.EelcoOn 9/14/05, Scot

Re: [Wicket-user] Why is FileResourceStream final?

2005-09-14 Thread Martijn Dashorst
Just thought of a better translation of the dutch saying:     "no is a fact, yes a possibility"; Just seems like translating sayings from one language into another is hard. Almost like switching between Eclipse and VS2003 ;-) MartijnOn 9/14/05, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: That's no

Re: [Wicket-user] Why is FileResourceStream final?

2005-09-13 Thread Eelco Hillenius
That's not a certainty though. We tend to be carefull when opening up the API. Eelco On 9/14/05, Scott Sauyet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> = Scott Sauyet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > = Eelco Hillenius > > >> Is there a good reason to have FileResourceStream final? [ ... ] > > I made it

Re: [Wicket-user] Why is FileResourceStream final?

2005-09-13 Thread Scott Sauyet
>> = Scott Sauyet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > = Eelco Hillenius Is there a good reason to have FileResourceStream final? [ ... ] > I made it non-final. Ask and you shall receive. Thanks. -- Scott --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tam

Re: [Wicket-user] Why is FileResourceStream final?

2005-09-13 Thread Martijn Dashorst
A dutch saying: 'nee heb je, ja kun je krijgen' (roughly translated as:) you already have no for an answer, just ask, you might get a yes. On 9/14/05, Phil Kulak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > haha, I should have just asked. I've been using my own non-final > FileResourceStream for months now. :D >

Re: [Wicket-user] Why is FileResourceStream final?

2005-09-13 Thread Phil Kulak
haha, I should have just asked. I've been using my own non-final FileResourceStream for months now. :D On 9/13/05, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I made it non-final. > > Eelco > > > On 9/13/05, Scott Sauyet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is there a good reason to have FileResourc

Re: [Wicket-user] Why is FileResourceStream final?

2005-09-13 Thread Eelco Hillenius
I made it non-final. Eelco On 9/13/05, Scott Sauyet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there a good reason to have FileResourceStream final? I may be > missing a better way to use it, but I feel I'm jumping through some > serious hoops because I want to override one method of this class. What > I

[Wicket-user] Why is FileResourceStream final?

2005-09-13 Thread Scott Sauyet
Is there a good reason to have FileResourceStream final? I may be missing a better way to use it, but I feel I'm jumping through some serious hoops because I want to override one method of this class. What I'd like to do is this: add(new ResourceLink("downloadLink", new Resource() {