Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket 1.2 and wicket:header

2006-03-06 Thread David Leangen
I updated the wiki page with the discussion on this thread. Please let me know if the information I wrote is incorrect. http://www.wicket-wiki.org.uk/wiki/index.php/JavaScript --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking s

Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket 1.2 and wicket:header

2006-03-05 Thread Juergen Donnerstag
> you got it wrong, the is for Form, not Page, see me other > post. (based on your markup) I assume the Form is added to the Page. The Form's markup is contained in the Page's markup. In that sense only components with associated markup files are relevant (like panel, border, extends). Juergen

Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket 1.2 and wicket:header

2006-03-05 Thread Juergen Donnerstag
I assumed the example given by Jan was a Page (Page => derived from Page.java) because of the html structure (body tag etc and no wicket:extend, wicket:panel etc.). A standard normal Page does not need . You can place your component in and add() them. Panels , Borders and extended pages may hav

Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket 1.2 and wicket:header

2006-03-05 Thread Igor Vaynberg
On 3/5/06, Gili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Igor Vaynberg wrote:> On 3/5/06, *Gili* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: David Leangen wrote:>  >>  That's news to me. So when is used?>  >>  > In borders and components when you want to contribute to the > of> 

Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket 1.2 and wicket:header

2006-03-05 Thread Gili
Igor Vaynberg wrote: On 3/5/06, *Gili* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: David Leangen wrote: >> That's news to me. So when is used? > > In borders and components when you want to contribute to the of > the output. But Juerge

Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket 1.2 and wicket:header

2006-03-05 Thread Igor Vaynberg
On 3/5/06, Gili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: David Leangen wrote:>>  That's news to me. So when is used?>> In borders and components when you want to contribute to the of> the output. But Juergen said " in Pages don't make any sense". Isn't aPage a component too? So is Page different fr

Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket 1.2 and wicket:header

2006-03-05 Thread Gili
In http://www.wicket-wiki.org.uk/wiki/index.php/Markup_inheritance it reads: " does not make sense in page markup (but does in inherited page markup)" I plan on changing this to: " is not necessary in Page markup. Wicket interprets as automatically." Any objections?

Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket 1.2 and wicket:header

2006-03-05 Thread David Leangen
On Sun, 2006-03-05 at 23:09 -0500, Gili wrote: > > David Leangen wrote: > >>That's news to me. So when is used? > > > > In borders and components when you want to contribute to the of > > the output. > > But Juergen said " in Pages don't make any sense". Isn't a > Page a component

Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket 1.2 and wicket:header

2006-03-05 Thread Gili
David Leangen wrote: That's news to me. So when is used? In borders and components when you want to contribute to the of the output. But Juergen said " in Pages don't make any sense". Isn't a Page a component too? So is Page different from other components in that its is automaticall

Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket 1.2 and wicket:header

2006-03-05 Thread David Leangen
> That's news to me. So when is used? In borders and components when you want to contribute to the of the output. > You might want to > update the Wiki entry so more people don't run into this problem. The whole purpose of the wiki is so that anybody can contribute. The developers a

Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket 1.2 and wicket:header

2006-03-05 Thread Gili
That's news to me. So when is used? You might want to update the Wiki entry so more people don't run into this problem. Gili Juergen Donnerstag wrote: in Pages don't make any sense. Just remove it and you are done. Juergen On 3/4/06, jan_bar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I am migrati

Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket 1.2 and wicket:header

2006-03-05 Thread Juergen Donnerstag
in Pages don't make any sense. Just remove it and you are done. Juergen On 3/4/06, jan_bar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I am migrating Wicket 1.1.1 application to Wicket 1.2 (snapshot 20060302). > It seems that wicket:header doesn't work. My WebPage contains a MyForm. The > MyForm inheri

Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket 1.2 and wicket:header

2006-03-05 Thread Johan Compagner
please add a bug report, and describe or attach a test what you exactly do.johanOn 3/4/06, jan_bar < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Hi,I am migrating Wicket 1.1.1 application to Wicket 1.2 (snapshot 20060302).It seems that wicket:header doesn't work. My WebPage contains a MyForm. TheMyForm inherits from

[Wicket-user] Wicket 1.2 and wicket:header

2006-03-04 Thread jan_bar
Hi, I am migrating Wicket 1.1.1 application to Wicket 1.2 (snapshot 20060302). It seems that wicket:header doesn't work. My WebPage contains a MyForm. The MyForm inherits from From and markup has section. This section is not shown in the final markup. This worked in previous version. I tried to d