Here at www.vegas.com (you guessed it, in Las Vegas) we are actively
hiring Java developers, with all of our UI development in Wicket.
Cheers,
Scott
--
Scott Swank
reformed mathematician
-
This SF.net email is sponsored
Are there any rules about a company posting to this list about potential open
positions around Wicket?
Matt
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-mailing-list-rules-with-regards-to-jobs-tf4019684.html#a11416655
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at
On 7/3/07, Watter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are there any rules about a company posting to this list about potential
open
positions around Wicket?
go for it
-igor
Matt
--
View this message in context:
Hi Matt, as far as I know there are no strict rules.
Basically, if the position involves Wicket, nobody objects against such posts.
-Matej
On 7/3/07, Watter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are there any rules about a company posting to this list about potential open
positions around Wicket?
Matt
On 7/3/07, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Matt, as far as I know there are no strict rules.
Basically, if the position involves Wicket, nobody objects against such posts.
Specifically targets Wicket developers to be more exact. No general
catch all 'Wicket, Tapestry, JSF, Struts,
Well if that's the case I am happy to invite any Wicket adept living near
Amsterdam or willing to move there to have a look at the job opening at our
company :-)
http://www.feeddex.nl/vacatures.html
Cheers,
Wilko Hische
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
On 7/3/07, Matej Knopp [EMAIL
if it's specifically about wicket, posting is encouraged.
Watter wrote:
Are there any rules about a company posting to this list about potential
open positions around Wicket?
Matt
--
View this message in context:
In that case...
Is anybody on this list, living in the Kansai area in Japan, available
for purely Wicket development?
We're looking for somebody who can work on-site if possible.
Japanese language skills would be a great asset.
:-)
On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 21:06 +0200, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
