On 7/29/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> it is already in 1.2 branch if you want to play with it thanks to eelco's
> valiant efforts
And Matej's efforts to fix it all up again :) It's in
wicket-extensions for 1.2, and in 2.0 it replaces the core tree. I
made a note in that in the pa
it is already in 1.2 branch if you want to play with it thanks to eelco's valiant efforts-IgorOn 7/27/06, michal petras <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:That's great. Do you know when wiil it be ported to
1.2.1? It could reallyhelp me.--View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/wicket.markup.h
That's great. Do you know when wiil it be ported to 1.2.1? It could really
help me.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/wicket.markup.html.tree.Tree-is-not-suitable-for-very-big-tree-tf1978583.html#a5520367
Sent from the Wicket - User forum at Nabble.com.
---
Sounds great!On 7/24/06, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've just finished new (ajax based) tree (version for wicket 2.0 is insvn (/svnroot/wicket/trunk/wicket-sandbox/users/matej_k/tree) )It's about to be ported to wicket 1.2 and it will likely be a part ofwicket-extensions. It might help
I've just finished new (ajax based) tree (version for wicket 2.0 is in
svn (/svnroot/wicket/trunk/wicket-sandbox/users/matej_k/tree) )
It's about to be ported to wicket 1.2 and it will likely be a part of
wicket-extensions. It might help you because it works with TreeNode and
not DefaultMutable
> Could you give me more detailed information on what methods in Tree
> I should override?
>
There may be other/better ways, but what I did was this:
class MyTree extends Tree
{
private TreeModelProvider m_provider;
...
@Override
protected void junctionLinkClicked( DefaultMutableTre
Hi Dave,
Could you give me more detailed information on what methods in Tree I should override?
Regards,
RiceOn 7/21/06, David Leangen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As an additional note:Actually, I needed to load the data one level lower than what wasdisplayed, otherwise the junction images (with
As an additional note:
Actually, I needed to load the data one level lower than what was
displayed, otherwise the junction images (with the + signs) were not
displayed correctly.
Cheers,
Dave
On Fri, 2006-07-21 at 15:50 +0900, David Leangen wrote:
> I also have a very big tree, and it works
I also have a very big tree, and it works just fine.
The secret is to load only the data that is displayed. You need to
override the Tree class (it is made for this) and implement it so that
only the required data is loaded.
Good luck!
On Fri, 2006-07-21 at 13:46 +0800, Rice Yeh wrote:
> Hi
Hi, I find that the implementation of Wicket.markup.html.tree.Tree is not suitable for big tree. It seems because it depends on javax.swing.tree.DefaultMutableTreeNode
too much, which asks for populating the whole tree before rendering Wicket.markup.html.tree.Tree. For my case, the tree is very b
10 matches
Mail list logo
