AW: Re: Re: [Wicket-user] My take on Spring integration

2005-11-07 Thread sven
Hi Igor, >here is something i threw together that solves the deserialization >andability >to use the new operator to create pages. thanks for your work on this. Regretfully it's still a solution I wouldn't like to use: IMHO dependency injection should not be done by the object which has the d

AW: Re: Re: [Wicket-user] My take on Spring integration

2005-11-07 Thread sven
>and you have to have the pages defined as beans in the application >context? >with their properties specified? Yes, I configure most wicket stuff in a separate context, which is bootstrapped by a custom application factory: >but how does the above handle deserealization of pages? >

AW: Re: Re: [Wicket-user] My take on Spring integration

2005-10-24 Thread sven
>>An EditUserPage for example cannot be bookmarkable >>because it needs to know which user to edit. IMHO an EditUserPage parameterized with a userId is a perfect match for a bookmarkable URL. I didn't say, I'd never use setResponsePage(..). If I have large transactional state to be transferred t