I'm +1 on changing this as well
Juergen
On 8/24/05, Anders Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eelco Hillenius wrote:
>
> > I find it perfectly natural that the 'name'
> > property of a null object gets me null when working with Ognl. In
> > fact, that's another good reason to support this; al
Yep,. it should just ignore it. The property model regconizes it has
null as the actual model object, so it should just do nothing. Though
I can see this might introduce bugs that aren't immediately obvious,
it is still the case that we can't fail fast as the actual model
object can come from anywh
i think martijn means
What happens if you get the post request from the poster.
Where should the textfield set the data on?
I agree the other way around then null is just null...
johan
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
No, why? Wicket should react by checking for nulls and not failing.
Person p = (Perso
No, why? Wicket should react by checking for nulls and not failing.
Person p = (Person)getModelObject(); won't fail if it's null. Any
PropertyModel should just return null if the 'master' property is
null.
Why is that so strange? And what does it have to do with parsing
request parameters? I find
How should Wicket react to this?
public MyPage() {
add(new MyForm("form", new CompoundPropertyModel(null)));
}
public class MyForm extends Form {
public MyForm(String id, IModel model) {
super(id, model);
add(new TextField("name"));
}
}
This is what you propose... How sho
Pff... this is the third time I need to send this message, my providers'
smtp server has appeared on the black list of a spam blocker and no mail
gets through to the sf.net mailinglist from my home account. :-S
Anders,
Don't get me wrong, I don't mean to be harsh, but I think you don't
'grok'
I actually agree we should allow nulls. We have had discussions about
this in the past, but I'm definitively in the camp that wants to
either fail right away if a value (null) is not allowed, or be
flexible about what we support.
Eelco
On 8/23/05, Anders Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Igor
Cant you just do new CompoundPropertyModel(new HashMap()) ?
Also check out the wicket.util.value.ValueMap helper class.
-Igor
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Anders Peterson
> Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 10:48 AM
> To: wicke
