https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-698
- Juha
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
> Could you please open a JIRA issue[1] for this and attach the test case?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Eelco
>
> [1] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET
>
> On 6/26/07, Juha Alatalo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Juha
Could you please open a JIRA issue[1] for this and attach the test case?
Thanks,
Eelco
[1] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET
On 6/26/07, Juha Alatalo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Juha Alatalo wrote:
> > Johan Compagner wrote:
> >> Yes you have :). private final static IGetAndSet g
Juha Alatalo wrote:
> Johan Compagner wrote:
>> Yes you have :). private final static IGetAndSet getGetAndSetter(String
>> exp, Class clz) has changed quite a lot.
>>
>> > Do you have a unit test that fails now that shouldn't that i can
>> add to
>> > the PropertyResolverTest
Johan Compagner wrote:
> Yes you have :). private final static IGetAndSet getGetAndSetter(String
> exp, Class clz) has changed quite a lot.
>
> > Do you have a unit test that fails now that shouldn't that i can
> add to
> > the PropertyResolverTest ?
>
> No I don't.
>
>
Yes you have :). private final static IGetAndSet getGetAndSetter(String
exp, Class clz) has changed quite a lot.
> Do you have a unit test that fails now that shouldn't that i can add to
> the PropertyResolverTest ?
No I don't.
is this exception now thrown then:
throw new WicketRuntimeExce
Juha Alatalo wrote:
> Eelco Hillenius wrote:
>>> Thanks. I had blocked cookies on my test site for some reason. Why
>>> cookies are needed in 1.3? In 1.2 that wasn't the case, was it?
>> It shouldn't be the case now either; links should always be rewritten
>> so that it includes the jsessionid if t
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
>> Thanks. I had blocked cookies on my test site for some reason. Why
>> cookies are needed in 1.3? In 1.2 that wasn't the case, was it?
>
> It shouldn't be the case now either; links should always be rewritten
> so that it includes the jsessionid if the cookie is not availa
> Thanks. I had blocked cookies on my test site for some reason. Why
> cookies are needed in 1.3? In 1.2 that wasn't the case, was it?
It shouldn't be the case now either; links should always be rewritten
so that it includes the jsessionid if the cookie is not available (the
actual rewriting is do
Johan Compagner wrote:
> 1)
> If the model is List, PropertySolver doesn't try to find fields. We are
> using vectors containing public fields. In 1.2.6 this was ok.
>
>
> i dont know if we really changed the property resolver behavior like tis
> for 1.3
Yes you have :). private fin
1)
If the model is List, PropertySolver doesn't try to find fields. We are
using vectors containing public fields. In 1.2.6 this was ok.
i dont know if we really changed the property resolver behavior like tis for
1.3
Do you have a unit test that fails now that shouldn't that i can add to the
10 matches
Mail list logo