In the integrals below, \rho is just the electronic charge density (without
nuclei).
Thus c \int{\rho] does NOT vanish and gives c * NE (number of electrons).
However, if rho comes from electronic states, each eigenvalue is shifted by the
constant c
and thus the sum of eigenvalues cancels the c
Dear Prof. Blaha and Prof. Marks,
Thank you for your replies.
I'm afraid about the following thing: the Markove-Payne-like (Phys.
Rev. B 51, 4014) correction you propose should cancel the error which
exists due to the repulsion of charged defects in the periodic crystal
and results in some constan
I guess we had these questions before.
The TETRAHEDRON method calculates the DOS band by band.
With one k-point a "band" consists only of ONE energy and thus would give a
delta function. In other words: even if your eigenvalues are at 0.09 (band
1) and 0.11
(band 2), the DOS from tetra a
As mentioned before, the potential (and thus the density) should be ok.
With respect to forces I'd suggest you run a simple test. Take a simple
compound which has forces,
charge it, and compare the forces and the total energy.
You can test it even better by taking eg. your GaN, reduce the symmet
> Addendum: you can take the intermediate output, put them into a
> spreadsheet such as Excel and plot the dos yourself with some
> broadening -- it works but is not so convenient.
Two comments on this:
1) you can specify a broadening in case.int (see Sec. 8.1.3 of the UG)
2) there is a very ro
6 Cook Hall
> > 2220 N Campus Drive
> > Northwestern University
> > Evanston, IL 60208, USA
> > Tel: (847) 491-3996 Fax: (847) 491-7820
> > email: L-marks at northwestern dot edu
> > Web: www.numis.northwestern.edu
> > Chair, Commission on Electron Crystallography of IUCR
> > www.numis.northwestern.edu/
> > Electron crystallography is the branch of science that uses electron
> > scattering and imaging to study the structure of matter.
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Laurence Marks
> Department of Materials Science and Engineering
> MSE Rm 2036 Cook Hall
> 2220 N Campus Drive
> Northwestern University
> Evanston, IL 60208, USA
> Tel: (847) 491-3996 Fax: (847) 491-7820
> email: L-marks at northwestern dot edu
> Web: www.numis.northwestern.edu
> Chair, Commission on Electron Crystallography of IUCR
> www.numis.northwestern.edu/
> Electron crystallography is the branch of science that uses electron
> scattering and imaging to study the structure of matter.
> ___
> Wien mailing list
> Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
> http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
_
Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection.
https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20100225/0c64e9d3/attachment.htm>
s.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
> http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
_
Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free.
https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20100225/2575f4be/attachment.htm>
Dear Fhokrul,
With only one k-point you should only have a discrete set of energies.
Therefore I think the DOS would be a set of delta functions. Your energy
resolution in case.int is unlikely to capture them.
Best,
David.
Md. Fhokrul Islam wrote:
> Dear Wien2k users,
>
> I am trying to ca
https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20100225/df629fba/attachment.htm>
Dear Prof. Blaha,
I have another question on the topic. Does this problem also affect
the other quantities such as electron density, DOS and forces? If I
need to perform a geometric optimization after I have added a charge,
should I also apply the correction to the forces in order to get the
correc
Does it work for 1 k-point?
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Stefaan Cottenier
wrote:
>
>> Addendum: you can take the intermediate output, put them into a
>> spreadsheet such as Excel and plot the dos yourself with some
>> broadening -- it works but is not so convenient.
>
> Two comments on this
I think the forces are going to be OK, the issue is a constant energy
correction for the nominal background charge. Since this should be
constant, I don't think it will contribute at all to forces which
depend upon gradients.
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 6:07 AM, Yurko Natanzon
wrote:
> Dear Prof. Bla
Dear Peter,
Yes, the background charge must be taken into account as part of the
net-neutral total charge in order to have well-defined total energy.
Then as long as the compensation charge is then in exactly the same
way as the remaining "physical" charge (i.e., enters all the same
integ
> Is the question regarding the computation of total energy per unit cell
> in an infinite crystal with non-neutral unit cells? If so, then the
> total energy diverges -- and so is not well-defined. (So neutralizing
> backgrounds must be added in such cases to obtain meaningful results,
> e
Addendum: you can take the intermediate output, put them into a
spreadsheet such as Excel and plot the dos yourself with some
broadening -- it works but is not so convenient.
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 8:44 AM, Laurence Marks
wrote:
> I believe that as currently structured the utility programs for
>
I believe that as currently structured the utility programs for
analyzing the dos only work for more than one k-point. In principle it
should not be too hard to wade through the code, see where it is
getting confused if there is only one k-point, and change the code
slightly so it will do some reas
Thank you for the replies. I thought that such a correction was
already done in Wien2k. I should have noticed the warning in case.scf0
file:
:WARN :CHARGED CELL with -1.000
an energy correction like C Q**2/(L eps) is not included
(PRB51,4014; PRB73,35215)
I'm not sure if I unders
___
> >> Wien mailing list
> >> Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
> >> http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Wien mailing list
> > Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
> > http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Laurence Marks
> Department of Materials Science and Engineering
> MSE Rm 2036 Cook Hall
> 2220 N Campus Drive
> Northwestern University
> Evanston, IL 60208, USA
> Tel: (847) 491-3996 Fax: (847) 491-7820
> email: L-marks at northwestern dot edu
> Web: www.numis.northwestern.edu
> Chair, Commission on Electron Crystallography of IUCR
> www.numis.northwestern.edu/
> Electron crystallography is the branch of science that uses electron
> scattering and imaging to study the structure of matter.
> ___
> Wien mailing list
> Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
> http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20100225/63c97315/attachment.htm>
18 matches
Mail list logo