[Wien] Fe_cubic_229:QTL Error

2010-05-07 Thread Ghosh SUDDHASATTWA
we can solve this problem Suddhasattwa Ghosh -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20100507/4d3411cc/attachment.htm

[Wien] Fe_cubic_229:QTL Error

2010-05-07 Thread Ghosh SUDDHASATTWA
Hi Kurt, Thanks for the reply. My last iteration in case.scf is given :ITE013: 13. ITERATION - :NATO :1 INDEPENDEND AND1 TOTAL ATOMS IN UNITCELL SUBSTANCE: Fe_cubic_229 LATTICE = B :POT : POTENTIAL OPTION 13 :LAT : LATTICE

[Wien] Fe_cubic_229:QTL Error

2010-05-07 Thread Peter Blaha
It is hard to believe: You added a LO for Fe 3s (this means that you treat Fe 3s now as band state). :E0_0001: E( 0)= -5.7795 E(BOTTOM)= -5.803 E(TOP)= -5.756 :NOE : NUMBER OF ELECTRONS = 14.000 But you did not change the number of electrons ?? 3s^2,3p^6,3d^6,4s^2 to 16

[Wien] Fe_cubic_229:QTL Error

2010-05-07 Thread Ghosh SUDDHASATTWA
Dear Dr.Blaha, thanks for the immediate reply. I am really ashamed I made that error. During lstart, I had put -6.0 Ry as the separation energy. I should have put -7.0 Ry. Sorry for the shameful error. Thanks again Dr.Blaha Suddhasattwa Ghosh -Original Message- From:

[Wien] Fe_cubic_229:QTL Error (Part II)

2010-05-07 Thread Ghosh SUDDHASATTWA
Dear Kurt, I made a very fundamental error and again reinitialized the SCF with lstart as -7.0 Ry I ran the command run_lapw -cc 0.0001 -ec 0.0001 -in1new 4 I got the modified case.in1 WFFIL(WFPRI, SUPWF) 8.00 104 (R-MT*K-MAX; MAX L IN WF, V-NMT .64950 5 0 global

[Wien] Fe_cubic_229:QTL Error (Part II)

2010-05-07 Thread Stefaan Cottenier
This is a typical example of a DEPE (Dark Energy Perturbation Error). By spurious events in the universe, dark energy is focussed at some areas of the Earth's surface. As a result, computers at those places start to generate random results when solving Kohn-Sham equations. Apparently you are

[Wien] Fe_cubic_229:QTL Error (Part II)

2010-05-07 Thread Stefaan Cottenier
But I guess, I did not address my question properly. My SCF gave an error when I added a LO for L=2. Even with this, it works here. Once you have added this LO, you should drop -in1new (it would overwrite case.in1 without re-adding the LO). Stefaan

[Wien] Fe_cubic_229:QTL Error (Part II)

2010-05-07 Thread Ghosh SUDDHASATTWA
I guess you are right Stefaan. It is because of DEPE I again ran with the LO with energy 1.2002 for L=2 I ended up getting L2Main-QTL B error. I guess something is wrong with my session itself. I will create a new session and come back to the mailing list Thanks Stefaan again SG

[Wien] Fe_cubic_229:QTL Error (Part II)

2010-05-07 Thread Peter Blaha
20.547 0.000 CONT 1 21.20020.001 CONT 1 With such lines in case.in1 you MUST get ghostbands. -- P.Blaha -- Peter BLAHA, Inst.f. Materials Chemistry, TU Vienna,

[Wien] Fe_cubic_229:QTL Error (Part II)

2010-05-07 Thread Stefaan Cottenier
20.547 0.000 CONT 1 21.20020.001 CONT 1 With such lines in case.in1 you MUST get ghostbands. But not with 20.547 0.000 CONT 1 21.20020.000 CONT 1 , right? (this helps a lot in order to get a smooth energy-vs-volume curve for bcc-Fe, which is rather

[Wien] mkl

2010-05-07 Thread HK
Hi, we installed the intel compiler and mkl on linux (64 bit, i870); however there's still a fatal error when compiling wien2k_09.2. Apparently the f90 looks for mkl, but that is nowhere: f90 -o ./aimc moduls.o charge.o gbass.o gener.o aim.o main1.o outin.o radial.o reduc.o rsur.o

[Wien] mkl

2010-05-07 Thread Laurence Marks
source the ifortvars.sh or csh version first. On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 12:42 PM, HK kleinke at uwaterloo.ca wrote: Hi, we installed the intel compiler and mkl on linux (64 bit, i870); however there's still a fatal error when compiling wien2k_09.2. Apparently the f90 looks for mkl, but that is