Re: [Wien] ‘mixer’ crashes when forces too large

2013-05-29 Thread Elias Assmann
Dear Laurence and Peter, Thank you for the suggestion of changing to TOT. It appears to work (I say appears because after 2 iterations I hit the dreaded QTL-B error, but still: progress!). Elias On 05/25/2013 08:37 AM, Peter Blaha wrote: I've never seen this before. Anyway, I

Re: [Wien] Problem in SO calculation

2013-05-29 Thread Elias Assmann
On 05/28/2013 05:32 PM, Peter Blaha wrote: The default value 0.30 has to be changed. Use the –in1ef switch in runsp_lapw This is NOT TRUE ! When you use the latest WIEN2k version, I do NOT recommend -in1ef anymore. Any 0.30 will be automatically adjusted to EF-0.2 Ry. I think that the FAQ

[Wien] QTL -B error in mBJ

2013-05-29 Thread Muhammad Sajjad
Dear Wien2k Users I am trying to run mBJ for a ternary alloy. everything was right but every time QTL -B error appears. the error statement is *[msajjad@msajjad SCF]$ runsp_lapw -cc 0.0001 -in1new 2 -i 100 -NI* * LAPW0 END* * LAPW0 END* * LAPW1 END* * LAPW1 END* *L2main - QTL-B Error* * * Please

Re: [Wien] Problem in SO calculation

2013-05-29 Thread Stefaan Cottenier
I guess that typos in these posts have caused some confusion. Peter, you probably meant -in1new instead of -in1ef? Because what you describe looks like the definition of -in1ef as it is found in the update list: VERSION_09.2: 29.9.2009 SRC: various fixes and improvements for the

[Wien] Compilation errors in mixer and telnes3

2013-05-29 Thread andrew tan
Hello all, I am a new wien2k user and had some problems during the compilation process. I am running version 11.1 on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS compiling with gfortran. After running the siteconfig_lapw and trying to compile all programs I get the following errors: * SRC_mixer/compile.msg:make: *** [mixer]

Re: [Wien] Problem in SO calculation

2013-05-29 Thread Peter Blaha
Yes, my doku is sloppy, but I did NOT make a typo. -in1ef was introduced in WIEN2k_09, but since WIEN2k_10 -in1ef does not appear as switch, because this is the default behavior anyway. Therefore it has also been removed from the UG (but unfortunately not from a faq-page). -in1new XX

Re: [Wien] Problem in SO calculation

2013-05-29 Thread Gavin Abo
I didn't check carefully, but is seems like run*_lapw scripts without -in1ef use: set in1new = 999 and with -in1ef use: set in1new = -1 Does this make default -in1ef switch behavior in Wien2k 12.1 not work correctly? On 5/29/2013 8:33 AM, Peter Blaha wrote: Yes, my doku is sloppy, but I

[Wien] error in lapw2

2013-05-29 Thread ben amara imen
hello I'm working on compound with spinell symetry When I do ' runsp_lapw' there is this following error : error in Lapw2 'l2main' -QTL-B.GT.15.? Ghosbands, check scf files But the strange that I did before the same calculation with the same compound and it worked well Can some one help

Re: [Wien] Compilation errors in mixer and telnes3

2013-05-29 Thread Laurence Marks
It can be ignored for the mixer. On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 10:24 AM, andrew tan andta...@gmail.com wrote: Hello all, I am a new wien2k user and had some problems during the compilation process. I am running version 11.1 on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS compiling with gfortran. After running the

[Wien] Cannot run kpoint parallel jobs - only serial.

2013-05-29 Thread Robert Nichol
Dear community. I've been utilizing WIEN for a little while now and have spent considerable time trying to get the code to work on the Ohio Super Computing Center's ( PBS queue system) Oakley Cluster. If I submit the script for k-point parallelization lapw2 to crashes. If I submit the script

Re: [Wien] Cannot run kpoint parallel jobs - only serial.

2013-05-29 Thread Laurence Marks
I strongly suggest that you break things into pieces and test seperately using an interactive queue, which will make many things simpler. a) Is fftw compiled using the mvapich mpicc? b) Did you try just mvapich (I never got mvapich2 to work right)? c) Try, interactively, x lapw0 -p (with a hand

[Wien] Supercell calculation dilemma with WIEN2k_12

2013-05-29 Thread Guo-ping Zhang
Dear Peter and Wien2k users, (Many thanks for your help for my previous questions!) I was trying to do a supercell calculation (60 atoms) within 28x28x28 (Angstrom^3), half of which is vacuum. Here are some of the questions that I have. (To be sure, I have searched all the previous 110 emails

Re: [Wien] Supercell calculation dilemma with WIEN2k_12

2013-05-29 Thread Laurence Marks
For a system like this you need to be using mpi. Depending upon how patient you are and the cores available to you somewhere in the range of 16-64 cores. You will never get anywhere otherwise. On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Guo-ping Zhang gpzh...@femto.indstate.edu wrote: Dear Peter and Wien2k

Re: [Wien] Problem in SO calculation

2013-05-29 Thread Ghosh SUDDHASATTWA
Dear Dr. Blaha, Dr. Cottenier, In my cases with regard to heavy elements, my calculations invariably fails at the SAME error (whatever ERROR started this thread of posts !!!) if I do not use the -in1ef switch. (RMT=2.5 Rk_max=8.0, kpoints about 3000) The -in1ef switch VERY NICELY changes the

Re: [Wien] QTL -B error in mBJ

2013-05-29 Thread Muhammad Sajjad
Dear Users I have found its solution from the mailing list, and up to now the calculations are running error-less. Thank you On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 10:48 PM, Muhammad Sajjad sajja...@gmail.comwrote: Dear Wien2k Users I am trying to run mBJ for a ternary alloy. everything was right but every