Re: [Wien] Segmentation fault in lapw0 -eece

2013-09-04 Thread Peter Blaha
The ineece file looks ok. I doubt, that TiC is a meaningful case for -eece !!! Checkout case.clmvalupeece (and dn) files. Do they look ok ? (No . NaN, only zeros, ...) On 09/05/2013 08:49 AM, 西村 真一 wrote: > Hi Peter, > > My case.ineece file for TiC example is as follow. > -9.0 1 em

Re: [Wien] Segmentation fault in lapw0 -eece

2013-09-04 Thread 西村 真一
Hi Peter, My case.ineece file for TiC example is as follow. -9.0 1 emin natom 1 1 2 iatom nlorb lorb HYBR HYBR / EECE mode 0.25 amount of exact exchange Are there any problems with this file? On 2013/09/05, at 15:05, Peter Blaha wrote: > Error in case.ineece

Re: [Wien] Segmentation fault in lapw0 -eece

2013-09-04 Thread Gavin Abo
I wonder if this could be caused by the fftpack. The fftpack was fine in 11.1, but it was broken in 12.1 and required fixes to fft_modules.F and vresp.F. The fft_modules.F looks fixed in 13.1. So far I haven't notice any problems, but maybe a case has been found that still needs the patch to vr

Re: [Wien] Segmentation fault in lapw0 -eece

2013-09-04 Thread Peter Blaha
Error in case.ineece Am 05.09.2013 06:29, schrieb 西村 真一: Dear Wien2k users, I met problem in -eece calcualtion. The operation I did was as follow; 1. init 2. runsp 3. save -d xxx 4. edit case.ineece (copied from SRC_templates) 5. runsp -eece After the 2nd lapw2, "x lapw0 -eece" failed.

Re: [Wien] Re : need clarification on changes in spin magnetic moment in cell after SCF run

2013-09-04 Thread Peter Blaha
Ok. This looks as if with increased doping (Si) the moment gets more stable. In particular in intermediate cases, it seems to be very "subtle" and small changes in parameters may give quite some effects. Even if it is expensive, you need to check k-mesh and also RKmax-convergence (I do not know

Re: [Wien] total energy

2013-09-04 Thread Peter Blaha
If the QTL-b warning happens during the scf cycles, but is not present in the final cycles, there should be no problems. If it is still present at the final cycle, you should do something with the l=1 energy parameters of atom 14 (and related atoms). Also the NE-warnings should not matter too m

[Wien] Segmentation fault in lapw0 -eece

2013-09-04 Thread 西村 真一
Dear Wien2k users, I met problem in -eece calcualtion. The operation I did was as follow; 1. init 2. runsp 3. save -d xxx 4. edit case.ineece (copied from SRC_templates) 5. runsp -eece After the 2nd lapw2, "x lapw0 -eece" failed. The output is: forrtl: severe (174): SIGSEGV, segmentation fault o

Re: [Wien] Reg: wannier

2013-09-04 Thread Swetarekha Ram
Respected Sir, I have not use the init_w2w. I have done this manually by executing the command one by one. Thanking You On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 11:34 PM, Elias Assmann wrote: > On 09/03/2013 02:28 PM, Swetarekha Ram wrote: > >> Then I used x kgen -so and took the 8*8*8 mesh and got total 512 p

Re: [Wien] Reg: wannier

2013-09-04 Thread Elias Assmann
On 09/03/2013 02:28 PM, Swetarekha Ram wrote: Then I used x kgen -so and took the 8*8*8 mesh and got total 512 points in the irriducible Brillouin zone. Then I ran x lapw1 find_bands case -2 1 write_w2win case and then write_win In this point I got the error massage as before Did you execute t

Re: [Wien] Wien2Wannier with spin-orbit coupling

2013-09-04 Thread Kyohn Ahn
Dear Elias, I'm really sorry for my late response, and appreciate your fruitful report (about ifort+ATLAS). My problem was solved: It was just the problem of reading "lapw2 -c" in dayfile. (and also I'm thankful for the discussion, http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/2013-August/0196

Re: [Wien] Why is the case.inorb file required for use in hybrid functionals

2013-09-04 Thread tran
As DFT+U, the onsite hybrid functionals are implemented in the orb module, therefore case.inorb is necessary (to specify the fraction of Hartree-Fock exchange and to which electrons it is applied). But, you don't need to care about case.inorb and case.indm(c) since they are created automatically b

[Wien] Why is the case.inorb file required for use in hybrid functionals

2013-09-04 Thread Joshua Davis
In the user-guide, it states that the case.inorb file is needed when using hybrid functionals. (option -eece). If I am using a hybrid functional, I shouldn't need a corrective U. Is the case.inorb file just used as place holder to invoke case.indm, the density matrix. Any help would be appreciat

Re: [Wien] Error in mBJGGA

2013-09-04 Thread Muhammad Sajjad
Dear Saeid Jalali Thank you so much, it is really helping. True Regards M Sajjad On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Saeid Jalali wrote: > Dear Sajjad, > > > I made a mistake in case.in0_grr by selecting indxc value 55 instead of > 50, and I am repeating this mistake for two days :( > > In order

[Wien] Re : need clarification on changes in spin magnetic moment in cell after SCF run

2013-09-04 Thread venkatesh chandragiri
Dear Blaha sir, Please, excuse me for the delayed reply. In the below, i have given the answers for your comments a) The first thing: Which magnetic state do you get for the normal Fe2VAl compound (in the "normal" small unit cell) ??? Answer : For normal Fe2VAl compound, the calculations shows