Re: [Wien] band in Hybrid functunal sumhfpara'

2013-11-13 Thread tran
So, I suppose these are the FFTs which take most of the time because of the large unit cell used for the vacuum. At the end of the files case.outputhf_* the timing is shown and the values for "FFT 3" and "FFT 4" should be much larger than the others. On Wed, 13 Nov 2013, ali ghafari wrote: both

Re: [Wien] band in Hybrid functunal sumhfpara'

2013-11-13 Thread ali ghafari
both structures have 3 atoms. Furthermore, I have selected the same values in case.inhf for both structures. On Wednesday, November 13, 2013 8:27 PM, "t...@theochem.tuwien.ac.at" wrote: I suppose that it's because there are more atoms in the unit cell for nanoribbon than for bulk. How man

Re: [Wien] band in Hybrid functunal sumhfpara'

2013-11-13 Thread tran
I suppose that it's because there are more atoms in the unit cell for nanoribbon than for bulk. How many atoms do contain these unit cells? In general, since hybrid functionals are very expensive it is recommended to do some tests to search for the lowest values of the parameters in case.inhf whi

Re: [Wien] band in Hybrid functunal sumhfpara'

2013-11-13 Thread ali ghafari
Dear Tran Thank you very much for reply. I'm using 50 K-point for ploting band structure of ZrSe2 bulk Β and nanoribbon. But in the bulk structure "run bandplothf lapw" is more than 100 times faster than nanoribbon. the question is why? Best Regards Ali On Wednesday, November 13, 2013 5:00 PM,

[Wien] Coefficients in SOC calculations

2013-11-13 Thread Kyohn Ahn
Dear WIEN2k users, I hope to obtain the coefficients for eigenvectors in case of including spin-orbit coupling, and have read below comments. # http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/msg01780.html # http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/msg07304.html In

Re: [Wien] ZnIn2Te4 structure confusion

2013-11-13 Thread Masood Yousaf
Thank you once again sir for your guidance. We will be fallowing your advice as we want to inspect a single trend. Best wishes Masood On Wednesday, November 13, 2013 5:46 PM, Stefaan Cottenier wrote: > Sir, Thank you for your response. we actually want to replace the anion > in ZnIn2X4

Re: [Wien] band in Hybrid functunal sumhfpara'

2013-11-13 Thread tran
sumhfpara does not run in parallel simply because this is the program which merges the vector files case.vectorhf_1, case.vectorhf_2, etc. created by hf on processors 1, 2, etc. Anyway, sumhfpara is very fast (a few seconds). This is hf which is very expensive. How many k-points are you using for

Re: [Wien] Reg: Supercell calculation

2013-11-13 Thread Shwetha Gummula
Dear wien2k users and developers, Thank you Uday sir, Pieper sir for your reply. It is so helpful for me. Thanking you On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 3:35 PM, pieper wrote: > Dear Swetha Gummula, > > The physical properties of a material do not depend on wether or not you > make use of symmetry p

Re: [Wien] NMR calculation in Spin-polarized cases

2013-11-13 Thread Carlier Dany
Dear Mitsunori Nakamoto, I beleive that the NMR module implemented in wein2k concerns only the calculation of the chemical shift and not the Fermi contact shift. Is is therefore normal to find a value close to the one of LiCl, since the chemical shift range for Li in diamagnetic compounds is re

Re: [Wien] ZnIn2Te4 structure confusion

2013-11-13 Thread Stefaan Cottenier
Sir, Thank you for your response. we actually want to replace the anion in ZnIn2X4 by X=S,Te, Se, O to see an effect. For compounds ZnIn2O4, ZnIn2S4 we are certain that they have spinel structure with space group no. 227. So we want to execute ZnIn2Te4 in the same spinel structure to verify an e

Re: [Wien] ZnIn2Te4 structure confusion

2013-11-13 Thread Masood Yousaf
Respected Stefaan Sir, Thank you for your response. we actually want to replace the anion in ZnIn2X4 by X=S,Te, Se, O to see an effect. For compounds ZnIn2O4, ZnIn2S4 we are certain that they have spinel structure with space group no. 227. So we want to execute ZnIn2Te4 in the same spinel str

Re: [Wien] Large magnetic moment in LaCoO3 compound in Low Spin state

2013-11-13 Thread Elias Assmann
On 11/13/2013 11:29 AM, saurabh singh wrote: :MMI002: MAGNETIC MOMENT IN SPHERE 2=1.0879. It is well known that this compound shows zero moment in ground state for Low Spin. Why this is showing non zero moment. One thing to keep in mind is that you can often stabilize different magne

[Wien] Large magnetic moment in LaCoO3 compound in Low Spin state

2013-11-13 Thread saurabh singh
Dear Wien2K users and developers, I am calculating ground state for LaCoO3 in Low Spin state using wien2k_13.1 version. we have done LSDA calculation and getting the moment for Cobalt atom :MMI002: MAGNETIC MOMENT IN SPHERE 2=1.0879. It is well known that this compound s

[Wien] NMR calculation in Spin-polarized cases

2013-11-13 Thread Nakamoto, Mitsunori
Dear WIEN2k users and developers, I'm Mitsunori, an engineer in Sony. I'm interested in calculating NMR contact shifts by using the NMR module recently implemented in WIEN2k (v13). I have a question about NMR calculations in spin-polarized cases. First, the calculations on a paper (Phys Rev B 8

Re: [Wien] Reg: Supercell calculation

2013-11-13 Thread pieper
Dear Swetha Gummula, The physical properties of a material do not depend on wether or not you make use of symmetry properties when you calculate them. This is true also if you use Wien2k for your calculations - with the caveat that you should be careful to converge the scf to the same degree w

Re: [Wien] ZnIn2Te4 structure confusion

2013-11-13 Thread Stefaan Cottenier
Can we treat ZnIn2Te4 structure as a spinel having 𝐹𝑑-3π‘š 227 as a space group? Its structure is still contradictory discussed in the literature. Some studies suggest it as a defectchalcopyrite (DC) with (I4) structure and other reports suggest a defect-stannite structure (I 4 2m) for this compound

[Wien] ZnIn2Te4 structure confusion

2013-11-13 Thread Masood Yousaf
Respected community members Can we treat ZnIn2Te4 structure as a spinel having 𝐹𝑑-3π‘š 227 as a space group? Its structure is still contradictory discussed in the literature. Some studies suggest it as a defectchalcopyrite (DC) with (I4) structure and other reports suggest a defect-stannite struct