Thanks for your reply and suggestions. I went with RKmax up to 12Ry
and it turned out that 11 and 12 should be okay, since the splitting
starts to oscillate (change in the increasing trend with increased
RKmax). Concerning the non smooth behavior of the curve I did several
test calculations
Could you please send me your struct file, the k-mesh around Gamma and
some indications which band splitting you are looking up to my private
email.
I want to cross check this as it looks rather uncommon to me.
On 12/01/2014 08:10 AM, Martin Gmitra wrote:
Hi Fabien,
Thanks for your reply and
Thank you again for the detailed explanation.
I have some comments to make
Every one knows that the magnetic ordering of the NaCl structure of NiO is
paramagnetic, while that of the rhombohedral structure is antiferromagnetic.
But, my question is about if we have no information about the
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
Dear Peter Blaha
https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=wien%40zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.atq=from:%22Peter+Blaha%22
I mad SUPERCELL Li0,5TiO2 and When I
try to run the x dstart appears the error:
ROTDEF – Error
0.0u 0.0s 0:00.05 0.0% 0+0k 1728+16io 8pf+0w
and dstart.error
ROTDEF' - no symmetry
Are there any WARNING messages when you run 'x nn' on the supercell?
On 12/1/2014 3:58 PM, Sayah Jamal wrote:
Dear Peter Blaha
https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=wien%40zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.atq=from:%22Peter+Blaha%22
I mad SUPERCELL Li0,5TiO2 and When I
try to run the x dstart
Both structures are almost the same, the rhombohedral one is shortened or
elongated in the 111 direction
If the cell is shortened then the Ni-Ni distance in the 111 planes is larger
than the distance between planes, then there is an antiferromagnetic ordering,
with Ni up in one plane and Ni dn
Dear Stefaan,
Yes, I have increased the Emax parameter to 18 Ry, see blue curve in
right plot. Indeed, it is one of the most important parameters.
Best,
Martin
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Stefaan Cottenier
stefaan.cotten...@ugent.be wrote:
Thanks for your reply and suggestions. I went
Dear Developers and WIEN2k users,Hi!I have run WIEN2k for non-polarized ScN-ZB
using LDA and using PBE-GGA to perform a mBJ calculation and I got two
different energy band gaps.For ZB-LDA I got Eg=0.337 eV and for ZB-PBE-GGA I
got Eg=0.078 eV. This is in conflict with what is written in the
9 matches
Mail list logo