Re: [Wien] Unable to stop core leakage out of MT sphere problem

2015-07-26 Thread Laurence Marks
This is in most cases because there is an error in your lattice parameters and/or positions. Please send your struct file. --- Professor Laurence Marks Department of Materials Science and Engineering Northwestern University http://www.numis.northwestern.edu Corrosion in 4D http://MURI4D.numis.nort

[Wien] Reconstructed Si 100 surface

2015-07-26 Thread Muhammad Sajjad
Dear Users Kindly guide me how to reconstruct Si 100 layer? The Si 100 structure is attached here with. It has two dangling bonds on both surfaces (Top and Bottom). My intension is to keep one dangling bond on the top and bottom surfaces that will be saturated by H addition. -- Kind Regards Muhamm

Re: [Wien] Unable to stop core leakage out of MT sphere problem

2015-07-26 Thread Laurence Marks
Please only send emails to the list. Your structure is wrong, RMTs of 1.38 for Te and 0.7 for V never occur for a real material. When you have the correct structure the core leakage issue will go away. Finding out what you have done wrong is your job. --- Professor Laurence Marks Department of M

Re: [Wien] Reconstructed Si 100 surface

2015-07-26 Thread delamora
This is the same that I simplified and symmetized. If you are going to add H then you need set the space group as P1 (#1) so the H can move freely and not in a symmetrical path. Now, if you use my proposed structure then you can put inversion (SG P-1, #2) and add two H, one on each surface, but

Re: [Wien] Reconstructed Si 100 surface

2015-07-26 Thread Muhammad Sajjad
Thank you Pablo But I am required to connect two Si atoms at the surface to reduce one dangling bond and then put H or may be H is not needed if both of the dangling bonds have possibility of omitting. I am reading the paper but could not understand although Fig. 2 is looking easy to understand. WH

Re: [Wien] Reconstructed Si 100 surface

2015-07-26 Thread delamora
Muhamad, I do not understand what is what you want to do, if you want to passivate the dangling bonds then you need two H atoms. Now, if you want to study how the H atoms move towards the Si surface then you have a different problem. Which paper are you talking about?

Re: [Wien] Reconstructed Si 100 surface

2015-07-26 Thread delamora
Muhamad, We did a adsorption of Au on Montmorillonite; Density Functional Theory Study of Au n (n 5 1-5) Clusters Supported on Montmorillonite International Journal of Quantum Chemistry 2012, 112, 3646-3654 This seems similar to what you are doing. Pablo _

Re: [Wien] Reconstructed Si 100 surface

2015-07-26 Thread Michael Sluydts
Muhammad, When you move the two Si atoms with the dangling bond towards eachother you will create a dimer on the surface, no extra passivation by H atoms is needed, just ensure you make your slab symmetric where possible. If you google Si recontructions you should find very exact geometrical

Re: [Wien] k-points of doped material

2015-07-26 Thread delamora
As I said, the first structure is F (press f3 in xcrysden and you will see the primitive cell) the second structure is P (if you press f3 nothing will happen in xcrysden). So the P structure is 4x larger. Sorry, I was wrong with the counting in the last mail, in the F cell you have 4 atoms and

[Wien] 0.098 core electron leakage for Nb atom after lstart

2015-07-26 Thread shamik chakrabarti
Dear Wien2k users, We are working on a Nb doped alloy, in which after lstart (with -8.3 for stopping leakage of 0.22 Ni electron), an warning appears: there is a leakage of 0.098 electron with no indication of energy level. Now, whether 0.098 core leakage can be neglected & we c