Thank you, this solved both problems, the plot is complete and the y axis are
now correct.
Pablo
De: wien-boun...@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
en nombre de Peter Blaha
Enviado: martes, 15 de septiembre de 2015 08:43 a. m.
Para: A Mailing list for WIEN2k
Dear Developers and Users,
I need some guidance.
I understand that in gga/lda the Kohn-Sham eigenstates are regarded as excited
only when the scissors operator is non zero, is this correct?
If yes then how valid is optical calculation when the scissors operator is set
to zero? If no then what b
You never told us that you do SO !!
There is another Emax in case.inso, which you need to increase.
On 09/15/2015 03:39 PM, delamora wrote:
Gerhard,
Thanks
Checking further I tried Fe, I had no problem, it was OK, but when I tried with
SO then the plot ended shortly after Ef
With this inform
I meant that the "y" axis were [-1:1]
De: delamora
Enviado: martes, 15 de septiembre de 2015 08:39 a. m.
Para: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users
Asunto: Re: Incomplete DOS
Gerhard,
Thanks
Checking further I tried Fe, I had no problem, it was OK, but when I t
Gerhard,
Thanks
Checking further I tried Fe, I had no problem, it was OK, but when I tried with
SO then the plot ended shortly after Ef
With this information I tried Pd without SO and the plot came OK, I repeated
the calculation with SO and again the plot stopped below Ef, only the up spin
plot
Right
I forgot to mention about XC potentials. Identical Potentials were used. I
already read the document related to computing EFG by WIEN2K. How to isolate
the EFG contribution of Co-3p?
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Stefaan Cottenier <
stefaan.cotten...@ugent.be> wrote:
> According to my
According to my understanding, core-state with tag F are valence states.
AM I right? If yes then why it is taking 3P states as valence states?
The valence electrons for Co are 3d7, 4s2.
You use the words 'valence electrons' in the traditional 'chemical' way
as states outside the noble gas core.
Dear Prof. Stefaan and Blaha
Thank you for your reply.
Actually I have to reduce separation energy to -8.5 Ry because core leakage
issue was appearing with Ge.
If I focus on Co, the useful information is:
*Magnetic moment *
VASPWIEN2K
Co1 2.530:MMI001:
Resp. all
I am confused a bit that the Properties like, Electronic structure, optical
and thermoelectric properties are microscopic or macroscopic properties.
Regards
SIkander
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwi
Yes, and no.
You should think about what you really have.
Do you have a compound where the lattice parameter is set by 10^N atoms of
bulk not the dopant. In this case it is incorrect to change the lattice
parameter, but you need a large enough supercell to adequately model the
local relaxations (
Dear Sir,
I generally perform volume optimization during calculation of
materials. Does the same apply for doped materials also.
yours faithfully,
kabita
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/lis
did you check that the file
case.dos1dn, case.dos1evdn, case.dosvup, and case. dos1evup
are ok ? can you use them to plot the DOS ?
Ciao
Gerhard
DEEP THOUGHT in D. Adams; Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy:
"I think the problem, to be quite honest with you,
is that you have never actually known what
12 matches
Mail list logo