Re: [Wien] A new question about the spin texture calculations in WIEN2k

2020-06-15 Thread Yundi Quan
FYI: x lapw2 -so -up expects to use kpoints in case.klist. And x lapw2 -so -up -band expects to use k points in case.klist_band. You can always find out the input klist by inspecting lapw2.def or uplapw2.def On Monday, June 15, 2020, Artem Tarasov wrote: > Dear Prof Peter Blaha, > > I’m pretty s

Re: [Wien] A new question about the spin texture calculations in WIEN2k

2020-06-15 Thread Artem Tarasov
Dear Prof Peter Blaha, I’m pretty sure that running “x lapw2 -so -up” doesn’t lead to an error. I get no error messages and case.weightup is being overwritten in each time. I clear see that eigenvalues of energy are different from the case of “x lapw2 -so -up -band”. They are the same as the

Re: [Wien] Wien Installation

2020-06-15 Thread Gavin Abo
Those undefined references, such as _intel_fast_memcpy, are defined in an Intel compiler library [1].?0?2 When using Intel compilers (ifort/icc/mpiifort), typically mkl is used instead of OpenBLAS as well as the Intel MPI Library [2].?0?2 Since you have used the gnu compilers (gfortran/gcc) to

Re: [Wien] Wien Installation

2020-06-15 Thread ????
Thank you for your details. Now, there is another problem. In order to generate the lapw0_mpi command, when I run ??make para?? in the SRC_lapw0, a part of the errors is shown as the following and the whole information is attached:  mpif90 -o ./lapw0_mpi cputim.o modules.o  W2kinit.o fft_modu

Re: [Wien] Structure relaxation for WO3 with atomic insertion

2020-06-15 Thread Israel Omar Perez Lopez
Dear experts Thanks a lot for your recommendations, I will apply them. I will keep you posted on this. Best Regards -Original Message- From: Wien On Behalf Of Peter Blaha Sent: Monday, June 15, 2020 5:21 AM To: wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at Subject: Re: [Wien] Structure relaxation

Re: [Wien] Structure relaxation for WO3 with atomic insertion

2020-06-15 Thread Gavin Abo
In addition to the comments by the others, you might also check for the monoclinic if using beta as not equal 90 (where you have beta=90.881 below) for optimization is okay or not by referring the following link: https://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/msg12124.html On 6

Re: [Wien] Structure relaxation for WO3 with atomic insertion

2020-06-15 Thread Peter Blaha
As was mentioned before: For cubic, all your atoms are on high symmetry positions with (by symmetry) fixed positions. (It is like a NaCl structure). The code tells you: Forces are not present and there is nothing to optimize. So all you can do with this symmetry is a volume optimization, or y