Re: [Wien] segmentation fault in lapwso

2021-08-19 Thread Laurence Marks
I would not be so sure it is MKL. Did you check the version? Did you find a way to reproduce it with -g and/or -C? MKL is not perfect, but... On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 1:14 PM Pavel Ondračka wrote: > BTW I did the Valgrind run and there is nothing there (I don't have the > affected MKL, but eithe

Re: [Wien] segmentation fault in lapwso

2021-08-19 Thread Pavel Ondračka
BTW I did the Valgrind run and there is nothing there (I don't have the affected MKL, but either with OpenBLAS or with the Netlib LAPACK/BLAS there are no Valgrind defects at all in the Wien2k code, just some harmless leaked memory.) So yeah, confirming this is definitelly MKL. Pavel On Thu, 2021

Re: [Wien] segmentation fault in lapwso

2021-08-19 Thread Laurence Marks
A suggestion: check your mkl version, as there is a mkl bug that was recently fixed, see https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Problem-with-LAPACK-subroutine-ZHEEVR-input-array-quot-isuppz/td-p/1150816 _ Professor Laurence Marks "Research is to see what everybody else

Re: [Wien] segmentation fault in lapwso

2021-08-19 Thread Peter Blaha
I'm still on vacations, so cannot test myself. However, I experienced such problems before. It has to do with multithreading (1 thread works always fine) and the mkl routine zheevr. In my case I could fix the problem by enlarging the workspace beyond what the routine calculates itself. (see c

Re: [Wien] unable to find the "x" executable path at Cray node

2021-08-19 Thread venky ch
Dear Wien2k users, Sorry, it is my mistake in the jobscript. Now this error has been fixed. Please ignore this message thread. thanks Venkatesh Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Instrumentation and Applied Physics IISc Bangalore, India On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 11:45 AM venky ch wrote: > Dear