Re: [Wien] Optimized lattice constants using pbe+U

2023-08-28 Thread Park, Ken
d-U is applied only within the spheres in WIEN2k and > since the Ti-3d states are not too localized, there might be an > effect. > > Am 24.08.2023 um 17:55 schrieb Park, Ken: >> Dear Wien2k experts, >> >> I have been studying the effect of the Hubbard U on vario

Re: [Wien] Optimized lattice constants using pbe+U

2023-08-25 Thread Park, Ken
plied only within the spheres in WIEN2k and since the Ti-3d states are not too localized, there might be an effect. Am 24.08.2023 um 17:55 schrieb Park, Ken: > Dear Wien2k experts, > > I have been studying the effect of the Hubbard U on various phases of > TiO2 using wien2k 23.2. I h

[Wien] Optimized lattice constants using pbe+U

2023-08-24 Thread Park, Ken
Dear Wien2k experts, I have been studying the effect of the Hubbard U on various phases of TiO2 using wien2k 23.2. I have observed that some calculated properties are different from those reported in literature (mostly with pseudopotential) and would like to get your suggestions to see if I have

[Wien] SCAN+U in k parallel using Wien2k 21.1

2023-05-27 Thread Park, Ken
Dear Wien2k developers, I am trying to include the Hubbard U term with SCAN using wien2k 21.1 in k parallel mode, but having some trouble. For a quick testing with tio2 rutile, I used 2 nodes (4 processors each) with rkmax=8 (and all other default values) for pbe and SCAN. init_lapw -b -rkmax 8

Re: [Wien] ,IRelast: incorrect structure for e=0.3 in C44 for TiO2

2022-11-16 Thread Park, Ken
I see. Thank you. From: m_jama...@yahoo.com Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 at 9:22 PM To: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users , Park, Ken Subject: Re: [Wien] ,IRelast: incorrect structure for e=0.3 in C44 for TiO2 I was able to verify the crash using e=0.3 for C44 with -set-TOL option as

Re: [Wien] ,IRelast: incorrect structure for e=0.3 in C44 for TiO2

2022-11-15 Thread Park, Ken
O), -4018.09118114 (As stated in the other email, I was able to calculate the e=0 in O to get -4018.09271499) By the way, were you able to verify the crash using e=0.3 for C44? From: m_jama...@yahoo.com Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 at 10:06 PM To: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users , Park, Ken

Re: [Wien] ,IRelast: incorrect structure for e=0.3 in C44 for TiO2

2022-11-14 Thread Park, Ken
tetragonal under orthorhombic, -0.25 -4018.092634 -0.1 -4018.09269 0 -4018.092715 0.1 -4018.09269 0.25 -4018.092634 From: Wien on behalf of Park, Ken Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 at 8:19 AM To: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users Subject: Re: [Wien] ,IRelast: incorrect structure for e=0.3 in

Re: [Wien] ,IRelast: incorrect structure for e=0.3 in C44 for TiO2

2022-11-14 Thread Park, Ken
Prof. Jamal, Thank you for your reply. I just emailed you with the requested files. I also have included *.outputeos, which was used to calculate the elastic moduli at 0 GPa. Sincerely, Ken From: Wien on behalf of Morteza Jamal via Wien Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 at 4:22 AM To: wien@zeus

Re: [Wien] ,IRelast: incorrect structure for e=0.3 in C44 for TiO2

2022-11-14 Thread Park, Ken
Restast could play around Best regards Peter Blaha --------- Von: "Park, Ken" Datum: 13.11.2022, 16:18 An: "wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at" Dear Wien2k developers and experts, I have been using wien2k 21.1 and IRelast package to calculate the elastic constants f