,
Salman Zarrini
Chemical Engineering Department
Drexel University
Philadelphia, PA, US.
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:
http://www.mail-archive.com
+++
Dear Martin and Delamora,
Many thanks for your answer, actually, controversial state for me here
is 3d orbitals of Ni elements crystalline together with boron in a
orthorhombic structure, Pnma space group. I can see different kind of
point group in
Dear Wien2k users,
I was wondering that how can I find out which kinds of crystal field
splitting (Octahedral, Tetrahedral, Pentagonal bipyramidal,...) have
been applied on my bulk metallic structure?
Best regards,
Salman
___
Wien mailing list
.
And also, for me a Ferrimagnetic looks like a Spin unrestricted
configuration ... .
Best regards,
Salman Zarrini
+++
You are asking an impressive list of things and it is not easy
to answer them. You would need a complete master course for this.
1) Let me
for O2 molecule.
Cheers,
Salman Zarrini
+
[Hide Quoted Text]
Subject: [Wien] Bridging from Physics to Chemistry
+++
Dear Wien2k users,
I get always confused while bridging from Physics to Chemistry
Roald
Hoffmann in my archive.
Cheers,
Salman Zarrini
+++
I guess that you are a chemist (may I ask your main subject?) trying
to follow
a road to solid state physics. Wellcome to the road.
May be you will find useful the book by Roald Hoffmann that tries to
introduce
kelvin is the temperature considered in all the DFT level
calculations and codes, and in another hand we know that
paramagnetic behavior shows up at higher than specific temperatures
like curie and neel in solid states
Best regards,
Salman Zarrini
treated in a plane wave code like Wien2k.
To start, I can just say: doing a non-spin polarized calculation in
for example Wien2k (run_lapw) equals to a Closed shell calculation.
And also, for me a Ferrimagnetic looks like a Spin unrestricted
configuration ... .
Best regards,
Salman Zarrini
the force convergence threshold, and so, the job is still
running. So, I was wondering if the frozen atoms are included from
force convergence in a MSR1a minimization? If so, is there any way to
exclude frozen atoms and if does it make sense?
Cheers,
Salman Zarrini
+
Dear Wien2k user,
I have a converged MSR1a calculation of a single water molecule on
top of a partly free (partly frozen) surface while the initial
distance between them is d1, I want to recalculate exactly the same
job
+++
Dear Wien2k user,
I was wondering why CPU usage in my machine oscillates around 200 in
lapw12, although, The OMP_NUM_THREADS equals to 1 in my .bashrc
(export OMP_NUM_THREADS=1)?
P.S.setenv USE_REMOTE 0 in the parallel_options.
Dear Wien2k users,
The rates of surface dangling bonds can be represented in the surfaces
energy, however, I was wondering if there are any other ways to number
the surface dangling bonds of a multi-element metallic surface?
Cheers,
Salman
___
Dear Wien2k user,
I was wondering why TOT would switch to FOR in case.in2-files
despite using -I flag?
Cheers,
Salman
The change of TOT to FOR is controlled by the -fc option. The meaning
of -I is that FOR is switched back to TOT at the start of a new scf
cycle. If -fc is present, than it will switch to FOR again for the
last iteration of that scf cycle.
Stefaan
= La= l= i= 0Typ= I= 0.18E-02err =
0.35E-04 or 2% q= 0.36E+00
:WARN : bad integral E= La= l= i= 0Typ= I= -0.76E-02err =
0.14E-03 or 2% q= 0.36E+00
Sincerely yours,
Salman Zarrini
E-mail: salman.zarr...@tu-darmstadt.de
Dear Wien2k user,
I would be appreciated if anybody could answer two below questions
concerning to the muffin-tin radius(RMT):
1. The RMT should be usually reduced for some percent in surface
relaxation(MSR1a) as we know, however, for a correct comparison of
some physical
version) has restricted
some resources for the users.
Use limit or ulimit commands to find out/set these values or ask
your sys-admin.
Am 08.10.2013 18:54, schrieb Salman Zarrini:
==
Dear Wien2k user,
Wien2k-12 is running
==
Dear Wien2k user,
Wien2k-12 is running in our machines which have enough memory as it is
clear below, however, all the jobs (even a very small one)are crashed
in LAPW2 either in k-point parallel or nonparallel mode
?
Actually, I would like to plot Plane average potential respect to Z
for a slab-vacuum model. So, any suggestions would be appreciated in
advance.
Cheers,
Salman Zarrini
E-mail: salman.zarr...@tu-darmstadt.de
___
Wien mailing list
Wien
19 matches
Mail list logo