Re: [Wien] :WARN : bad integral E= (telnes3)

2019-07-31 Thread Laurence Marks
Yes. L23 for Cr/Ni. Some look "fine", some look like rubbish. On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 6:45 AM Peter Blaha wrote: > NI/Cr K-edges or more likely L2,3 edges ??? > > TM-K edges should be fully converged (but beware of neglected quadrupole > excitations due to the high energy) > TM-L edges are

Re: [Wien] :WARN : bad integral E= (telnes3)

2019-07-30 Thread Peter Blaha
NI/Cr K-edges or more likely L2,3 edges ??? TM-K edges should be fully converged (but beware of neglected quadrupole excitations due to the high energy) TM-L edges are quite problematic anyway, at least in "correlated" oxides. Rerun with larger TM radii (and smaller O) and compare the

[Wien] :WARN : bad integral E= (telnes3)

2019-07-30 Thread Laurence Marks
For a (strange) Ni/Cr/O with RMTs of 1.75, 1.75, 1.52 I am getting reasonable K-edge EELS for the O (with a Slater 1/2 hole), but some of the Ni/Cr look bad. With them I am getting a stack of warnings in case.outputelnes which look like the radial integral is not converging well. Is this where one