Re: [Wien] Charge distance

2013-04-17 Thread Laurence Marks
N.B., As a relevant potential source of confusion, the DIFFERENCE CHARGE**2 in case.scfm is in fact a typo -- those lines are correctly the RMS charge difference. This will be corrected in a future release. On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Laurence Marks l-ma...@northwestern.eduwrote: The

Re: [Wien] Charge distance

2013-04-15 Thread Laurence Marks
The units are electrons/atom where multiplicity of sites is taken into account (and it is only within the muffin tins and for L=0). I will guess that -cc was probably used for charge convergence, although since the variables are charge density your second one makes more sense to me. Unless you

Re: [Wien] Charge distance

2013-04-14 Thread Laurence Marks
The Charge distance as output via for instance grep -e :DIS : is the RMS change within the muffin tins of the L=0 component of the original density and that after solution of the KS equations (i.e. lcore+lapw1/lapw2). It tends to zero at the fixed-point solution, i.e. the variational minimum of